当事人合意选择权的法理基础及制度构建

发布时间：2017-12-28 21:34

本文关键词：当事人合意选择权的法理基础及制度构建　出处：《西北师范大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：近年来,伴随着司法改革的不断推进以及理论研究的不断延展,学界对于当事人的程序选择权予以认可,并进行相关研究,而当事人合意选择权正是程序选择权依据单方或双方行使为标准而分的一种权利。而我国法律对当事人合意选择权也有部分的相关性规定,但仍未形成相对完整的体系,并且在司法实务中也存在一些不足之处。本文从当事人合意选择权的法理出发,从学理方面阐述当事人合意选择权存在的理论基础及其功能定位,进而审视我国当事人合意选择权的现状,以此分析出我国的不足之处及原因,并提出具体的制度构建的构想,以完善我国的当事人合意选择权,从而节约司法成本、以及提升民众对民事司法的公信度和接纳度。文章由引言、主体、结语及参考文献四部分组成。引言介绍了当事人合意选择权理论的相关背景,主体则围绕着当事人合意选择权的法理基础及制度构建进行阐述与论证,结语则是,展望其未来的趋势。论文主体由以下三部分组成:第一章是当事人合意选择权的基本理论。首先,解析当事人合意选择权的基本定义,沿着其脉络了解理论背景,进而剖析其权利的特征。并且明确本文对当事人合意选择权的研究范围,是以民事诉讼一审为限定范围。其次,解析当事人合意选择权的自身权利性质。以对照不同权利及相关理论为基础,进一步厘清自身的性质。然后,对当事人合意选择权的理论基础作了分析,阐述当事人合意选择权存在的必要性。最后,明确当事人合意选择权的功能定位,有利于推进、深化司法改革。第二章是揭示了我国当事人合意选择权的现状与存在问题。首先,介绍我国当前的当事人合意选择权的现状,展现了在司法改革的进程中取得的一部分成绩。然后就我国当事人合意选择权目前存在的不足及原因以作分析,主要分为三个方面:关于当事人对于审理方式合意选择权的不足及原因;关于当事人对于审理程序的合意选择权的不足及原因;关于当事人对于合意不上诉制度的不足及原因。第三章论述了当事人合意选择权的制度构建。首先,要在诉讼的进程中不断完善其程序主体性的理念,由此提出两方面的建议,一方面合理配置法官权力和当事人合意选择权利,另一方面法官依法裁决、当事人理性选择。其次提出路径构建的建议,增设当事人在简易程序当中,可以合意选择言辞审理方式或书面审理方式的权利;完善当事人对于民事一审中普通转简易程序的合意选择权;完善当事人合意不上诉制度。
[Abstract]:In recent years, along with the continuous advancement of judicial reform and the continuous extension of theoretical research, academic circles on the party's right of choosing procedure to be recognized, and related research, and desirable option is the right to choose the procedure on the basis of one or both exercise and a right of the standard. However, there are some related provisions about the right of the parties to consent in China's law, but it has not yet formed a relatively complete system, and there are still some shortcomings in the judicial practice. The right to choose from the law of the parties, expounds the theoretical basis and function of the parties the right to choose from the existing theory, and then examines the status of our parties the right to choose, based on the analysis of the deficiency and the reason of our country, and puts forward the conception of the concrete system construction, in order to improve the acceptability of the parties in China the right of choice, thus saving the cost of justice, and enhance the credibility of civil justice and public acceptance. The article is composed of four parts: introduction, main body, conclusion and reference literature. The introduction introduces the relevant background of the party's consensual choice theory. The main body is about the legal basis and system construction of the consensual choice right of the parties. The conclusion is to predict its future trend. The main body of the paper is composed of the following three parts: the first chapter is the basic theory of the right of the parties to choose. First of all, it analyzes the basic definition of the right of the parties to choose the right, understand the theoretical background along its context, and then analyze the characteristics of its rights. And it is clear that the scope of the study on the right of the parties to choose the right is limited by the first instance of civil litigation. Secondly, it analyzes the nature of the right of the parties' right of choice. On the basis of different rights and related theories, we can further clarify the nature of its own. Then, it analyzes the theoretical basis of the right of the parties to choose the right, and expounds the necessity of the right of the parties to choose the right. Finally, it is beneficial to promote and deepen the judicial reform by defining the functional orientation of the parties' right of choice. The second chapter is to reveal the current situation and existing problems of the right of choice of the parties in our country. First of all, the present situation of the right to choose the parties in our country is introduced, and some achievements have been achieved in the process of judicial reform. Then our parties the right to choose the current problems and the causes for the analysis, mainly divided into three aspects: about the problems and the reasons for the trial way desirable option; the insufficiency and the reason about the right to choose the desirable proceedings; close the insufficiency and the reason to the parties for the agreement not to appeal system. The third chapter discusses the system construction of the parties' right of choice. First of all, we should constantly improve the concept of procedural subjectivity in the process of litigation, and put forward two suggestions. On the one hand, we must rationally configure the judges' power and the parties' right to choose their rights, on the other hand, judges decide according to law and the parties choose rationally. Secondly, put forward suggestions for the construction of additional path, the parties in the summary procedure, can be the best choice of trial or words written hearing rights; improve the option agreement for civil trial in common to the simple procedure; perfecting the parties do not appeal system.
【学位授予单位】：西北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】