民事庭前会议:规范解读、法理分析与实证考察

发布时间：2018-01-01 08:36

本文关键词：民事庭前会议:规范解读、法理分析与实证考察　出处：《现代法学》2016年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：2012年《民事诉讼法》及相关司法解释确立了庭前会议制度,标志着具实质意义的审前准备程序已经形成。作为审判活动的重要组成部分,庭前会议既为庭审做准备,又有相对的独立性,并承载着事实展示、争点确认、充实庭审以及促进和解与调解等多重功能。对庭前会议的实证考察表明,地方法院的积极探索为庭前会议的适用积累了丰富的实践经验,但也存在庭前会议内容不确定、效力不明确以及缺乏程序规范等问题。正确处理庭前会议与庭审的关系,坚持庭前会议与庭审一体化的程序设计,规范庭前会议的程序运作,明晰庭前会议中法官与当事人的作用分担,明确庭前会议的效力,有利于充分发挥庭前会议的功能。
[Abstract]:In 2012, the Civil procedure Law and related judicial interpretations established the system of pre-trial meeting, which marked the formation of a substantial pretrial preparation procedure, which is an important part of the trial activities. Pre-court conference is not only prepared for the trial, but also relatively independent, and bearing the facts of the show, point confirmation, enrich the trial and promote reconciliation and mediation and other multi-functions. The active exploration of the local courts has accumulated rich practical experience for the application of the pretrial conference, but there is also uncertainty in the content of the pre-court meeting. The effectiveness of the lack of clear and lack of procedural norms. Correctly deal with the relationship between the pretrial meeting and the trial, adhere to the pretrial meeting and court proceedings of the integration of the procedure design, standardize the pre-court meeting of the procedure operation. It is helpful to give full play to the function of the pretrial meeting by clarifying the role sharing between the judge and the parties and clarifying the effectiveness of the pretrial meeting.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.1
【正文快照】： 2012年修订的《民事诉讼法》(以下简称新《民事诉讼法》)在审理前的准备环节中新增了程序分流的规定(1),其中,对需要开庭审理的案件,要求通过当事人交换证据等方式明确争议焦点,但对交换证据、整理争点的具体方式语焉不详。2015年最高人民法院颁布的《关于适用〈中华人民共和

【相似文献】