刑事涉案财物处置的实证考察

发布时间：2018-01-03 12:30

本文关键词：刑事涉案财物处置的实证考察　出处：《江苏行政学院学报》2015年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国刑事涉案财物处置在司法实践中存在突出问题:为保障被害人的经济损失获得赔偿,侦查机关实施查封、扣押、冻结的范围存在扩大化倾向;侦查机关查封、扣押、冻结的涉案财产,人民检察院、人民法院无权直接解除;法院判决书中遗漏、概括没收的现象较为普遍;法院在作出判决时,将刑事没收转化为罚金刑,以规避其查证职责,并扩大了对涉案财产的剥夺范围。为解决上述问题,应在立法上对相关措施的对象范围、证据条件、举证责任、程序救济等作出具体规定。
[Abstract]:There are outstanding problems in the judicial practice of the disposal of property involved in criminal cases in our country: in order to ensure the victims' economic losses to be compensated, the investigative organs implement the seizure, seizure, and freezing of the scope of the tendency to expand; The people's procuratorate or the people's court shall not have the right to release directly the property seized, seized or frozen by the investigative organ; The phenomenon of general confiscation is common because of omission in the judgment of the court; When the court makes the judgment, it transforms the criminal confiscation into the fine penalty, in order to avoid its checking duty, and expands the scope of the deprivation of the property involved in the case. In order to solve the above problem, the target scope of the relevant measures should be legislated. Conditions of evidence, burden of proof, procedural relief and other specific provisions.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学法学院;
【基金】：美国福特基金会“中国刑事司法中经济性处分与制裁研究”项目(G66007365) 西南政法大学2012年引进人才科研项目(2012-XZRCXM004)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.2
【正文快照】： 随着我国刑事法制度在立法与司法实践的新发展,在司法实务领域,刑事涉案财产处置已经引起了社会大众的关注。2009年以来全国范围内的一系列集资诈骗案、涉黑涉恶案件中,查封、扣押、冻结措施及追缴、没收的适用对被追诉人的权益产生重大影响。在这些案件中,办案机关对犯罪嫌疑

【参考文献】