论审查起诉阶段证据审查制度的不足与完善

发布时间：2018-01-11 21:30

本文关键词：论审查起诉阶段证据审查制度的不足与完善　出处：《广东财经大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：近年来,内蒙呼格强奸杀人案、胥敬林抢劫、盗窃案、佘祥林杀妻案、王树红强奸杀人案、河北承德陈国清抢劫案、唐山李久明故意杀人案、河南安阳秦艳红强奸案等一系列冤假错案的一再发生,令我国的司法公正和法律公信力都面临着前所未有的挑战。冤假错案并不是我国所特有的产物,国内外的学者们都曾对关于如何防范冤假错案这个课题做过深刻的研究,前辈们的研究成果给予我很大的启示和帮助。冤假错案产生实际也是刑事案件证据审查的失败个案,笔者尝试结合实务工作,对如何完善审查起诉阶段的证据审查制度展开研究,以期对保障刑事诉讼参与人的合法权益,减少冤假错案,维护司法公正和法律公信力有所裨益。笔者通过本文,在前辈研究成果的基础上,梳理相关概念和理论,结合审查起诉的工作实务,分析我国审查起诉阶段证据审查制度的不足及成因,经过总结归纳,对如何完善我国审查起诉阶段的证据审查制度提出建议和工作设想,以期提高刑事案件证据审查的质量,有力地保障刑事诉讼参与人的合法权益,更大限度地减少冤假错案,维护司法公信力。
[Abstract]:In recent years, there have been cases of rape and homicide in Inner Mongolia, robberies by Xu Jinglin, burglaries, murders of wife she Xianglin, rape and murder by Wang Shuhong, robberies by Chen Guoqing in Chengde, Hebei Province, and intentional homicide by Li Jiuming in Tangshan. The repeated occurrence of a series of false and wrong cases, such as Qin Yanhong rape case in Anyang, Henan Province, makes our judicial justice and legal credibility face unprecedented challenges. Scholars both at home and abroad have done profound research on how to prevent unjust false cases. The research results of my predecessors give me great inspiration and help. The case of false and false is also the failure case of evidence review in criminal cases. The author tries to combine the practical work. In order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the participants in criminal proceedings and reduce the false and wrong cases, the author studies how to perfect the evidence review system in the stage of reviewing and prosecuting. The author of this paper, on the basis of the previous research results, combing the relevant concepts and theories, combined with the review of prosecution work practice. This paper analyzes the shortcomings and causes of the evidence review system in the stage of reviewing and prosecuting in our country, and puts forward some suggestions and working ideas on how to perfect the examination system of evidence in the stage of examination and prosecution after summing up and summing up. The aim is to improve the quality of evidence examination in criminal cases, to protect the legal rights and interests of the participants in criminal proceedings, to reduce the misdeeds and wrongs to a greater extent, and to maintain the judicial credibility.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】