论通过司法程序制定公共政策——兼论最高人民法院司法解释模式的转型

发布时间：2018-01-12 23:13

本文关键词：论通过司法程序制定公共政策——兼论最高人民法院司法解释模式的转型　出处：《政治与法律》2015年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：司法过程的性质和不断涌现的现代型诉讼决定了现代法院不仅履行传统的纠纷解决功能,而且有必要承担制定公共政策的功能。尽管该功能已经引起我国许多学者的关注,但是他们往往更加在意公共政策本身的合理性,而很少关注公共政策形成过程的正当性。总结现代法治经验,无论是直接解释或创制法律,还是在裁判结果中间接表明公共政策倾向,现代法院都遵循在司法程序的轨道内制定公共政策。最高人民法院通过司法解释的方式制定公共政策,不仅违背了司法权的行使方式,而且与公共政策制定的基本原理相悖。有鉴于此,最高人民法院应该放弃现行的司法解释方式,在改革现行两审终审制的情况下确保其通过司法程序制定公共政策。
[Abstract]:The nature of the judicial process and the continuous emergence of modern litigation determines that modern courts not only perform the traditional function of dispute resolution. And it is necessary to take on the function of making public policy. Although this function has attracted the attention of many scholars in our country, they often pay more attention to the rationality of public policy itself. However, little attention is paid to the legitimacy of public policy formation process. Summing up the experience of modern rule of law, whether it is the direct interpretation or creation of the law, or in the outcome of the judgment indirectly indicates the tendency of public policy. Modern courts follow the track of judicial procedures to formulate public policies. The Supreme people's Court through judicial interpretation of the way to formulate public policies, not only against the exercise of judicial power. And contrary to the basic principles of public policy formulation, the Supreme people's Court should abandon the current judicial interpretation. In the context of the reform of the current two-instance system of final appeal to ensure that it through the judicial process to formulate public policy.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925;D630
【正文快照】： 一、问题的提出自从1951年拉斯维尔(Lasswell)和勒纳(Lerner)发表《政策科学:范围与方法的新发展》以来,公共政策(public policy)日益成为社会科学研究中的一个热门话题。尽管目前公共政策已经发展成为独立的学科或者学术领域,但是由于公共政策涉及社会科学的方方面面,因此公

【相似文献】