民事执行财产调查基本问题研究

发布时间：2018-01-15 21:32

本文关键词：民事执行财产调查基本问题研究　出处：《云南大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：民事执行是私权救济的最后一道“工序”。在这道工序中,大多数案件的执行过程始于财产调查,终于财产处置。在法院对财产执行的整个司法流程中,财产查明程序是控制和处置程序的前提和基础,对整个执行案件的程序走向和实际结果都有着至关重要的决定性作用。然而,从司法实践的情况看,我国长期存在严重的“执行难”,表现为“被执行财产难查、被执行人难找、协助执行人难求、应执行财产难动”。本文试图从民事执行财产调查制度的程序本质、程序功能和程序要素入手,分析我国民事执行财产调查制度的现状和成因,并提出一些突破困境的思路。全文主体部分共分为四个部分。第一部分为基本问题。首先对民事执行财产调查制度的程序本质进行了梳理和澄清,接着论述了民事执行财产调查制度的程序功能,最后探讨了民事执行财产调查程序中程序参与者的基本程序性权利义务。第二部分分析探讨了我国民事执行财产调查制度的现状。立足我国现行制度规范,着重分析了我国民事执行财产调查制度的实践困境,并对司法实务部门的探索和努力进行了梳理。第三部分阐述了我国民事执行财产查明困境的成因。笔者认为,在法院为中心的财产调查模式下,法院必然需要背负不遗余力、不计成本查明被执行财产的伦理道德义务,而角色错位的执行机构设置注定了法院能够投入财产调查的人力、物力等司法资源的有限,这就形成了一个巨大的并且不断拉大的缺口；现代社会财产形式的变化,我国财产监管制度的落后,又使问题更加复杂；实践中对被执行人违法行为制裁的保守,使被执行人主动申报财产基本不可能,这又进一步加重了法院财产调查的压力。正是由于这些原因的交互作用、相互叠加,才形成了我国民事执行中“申请执行人难于提供、被执行人逃避申报、法院难于查明”的财产阐明困境。第四部分提出了突破民事执行财产查明困境的路径选择。笔者认为,从实践的情况来看,现行以法院为中心的财产调查模式已走入了死胡同,财产调查的效果和当事人的满意程度并不会当然随着法院的努力程度而得到强化。笔者主张,通过程序主体权利义务的合理配置,科学界定当事人和人民法院在财产调查中的关系,严厉制裁相关主体的程序违法行为,来构建一种“协同主义”的财产调查模式,通过所有程序主体的参与、配合和相互制约,逐步改善民事执行财产调查的境遇。
[Abstract]:Civil execution is the last "procedure" of private right remedy. In this procedure, the execution process of most cases begins with property investigation and finally property disposal. Property ascertainment procedure is the premise and foundation of control and disposal procedure, which plays a crucial and decisive role in the course of procedure and actual result of the whole execution case. However, judging from the situation of judicial practice. For a long time, there is a serious "execution difficulty" in our country, which shows that "the property executed is difficult to investigate, the executor is difficult to find, and the assistance to the executor is difficult to obtain." This paper attempts to analyze the present situation and causes of the civil execution of property survey system in China, starting with the procedural essence, procedural functions and procedural elements of the civil execution property survey system. The main part is divided into four parts. The first part is the basic problem. Firstly, the procedural essence of the civil execution property survey system is sorted out and clarified. Then it discusses the procedural function of the civil execution property survey system. Finally, it discusses the basic procedural rights and obligations of the procedure participants in the civil execution property survey procedure. The second part analyzes the current situation of the civil execution property survey system in China. Focusing on the analysis of China's civil implementation of property investigation system of practical difficulties. The third part expounds the causes of the plight of civil execution property in China. The author believes that in the court-centered property survey model. The court is bound to bear no effort to identify the ethical and moral obligations of the executed property regardless of the cost, and the misplaced enforcement agency is destined to put the court into the manpower of property investigation. Limited judicial resources, such as material resources, which has formed a huge and growing gap; The change of property form in modern society and the backwardness of property supervision system in our country make the problem more complicated. In practice, it is impossible for the executor to declare the property voluntarily because of the conservative sanction of the illegal behavior of the executor, which further increases the pressure of the court property investigation. It is precisely because of these reasons that the interaction. The superposition of each other formed the civil execution of our country "application executor is difficult to provide, the executor to escape the declaration." It is difficult for the court to find out the dilemma of property clarification. Part 4th puts forward the path choice to break through the dilemma of civil execution of property. The author believes that from the point of view of practice. The current court-centered property survey model has entered a dead end, the effect of property survey and the degree of satisfaction of the parties will not of course be strengthened with the efforts of the court. Through the reasonable allocation of the rights and obligations of the procedural subject, the relationship between the parties and the people's court in the property investigation is scientifically defined, and the procedural illegal acts of the relevant subjects are severely punished. To construct a "synergetic" property survey model, through the participation of all procedural subjects, cooperation and mutual constraints, gradually improve the civil implementation of property investigation situation.
【学位授予单位】：云南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.18

【相似文献】