论逮捕必要性审查制度

发布时间：2018-01-19 14:31

  本文关键词： 逮捕 逮捕必要性审查 社会危险性　出处：《河北大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：逮捕是限制人身自由的一种强制措施,其设定目的是保障诉讼程序的有效进行,但在保障诉讼程序的同时要确保犯罪嫌疑人的人权不受侵犯,所以逮捕强制措施不可以任意适用,必须要有一定的必要性,那么如何去审查逮捕的必要性是逮捕工作的核心内容。逮捕必要性审查,是指为了保障诉讼程序的顺利进行,结合社会危险性审查其是否有必要逮捕,在审查逮捕过程中办案人员要把握好人权和限制的平衡关系。不难看出,我们应该从三个方面去审查逮捕的必要性,即证据条件、刑罚条件和社会危险性条件,对证据、刑罚条件的审查相对较容易把握,但是社会危险性条件的审查存在一定的问题,社会危险性因素具有不特定性和不统一性,虽然修改后刑事诉讼法对社会危险性条件进行了细化,但是仍有一定的模糊性,把握起来也有一定难度,会因办案人员而异。受传统的办案观念的和司法理念的影响,“构罪即捕”、“以捕代侦”“以捕代罚”的思想仍然影响着现在的逮捕审查工作。侦查机关在侦查案件时往往注重案件事实证据的调取,而忽略证实社会危险性的相关证据。在检察实务工作中,虽然审查逮捕必要性已成为案件审查的必然,但是是否具有必要性往往被被害人的态度所绑架。如何去完善逮捕必要性的审查机制,应从社会危险性的风险评估、侦查取证方式、检察机关的听取意见制度、不捕说理制度、讯问犯罪嫌疑人情况、公众法治观念、羁押替代性措施、科学的考评机制等方面入手,让逮捕必要性机制更加完善、运行更加顺畅,更有利于找到保障诉讼程序进行与保障人权的最佳平衡点。总之,无论逮捕必要性审查模式具体怎么运行,对逮捕必要性的审查,需要办案人员有较高的内心确定力和良好的业务素质司法者在心存正义观念,根据不断变化的司法实践和具体的案件事实对既定的规则进行演绎和裁量。
[Abstract]:Arrest is a kind of coercive measure to restrict personal freedom. Its purpose is to ensure the effective conduct of the legal procedure, but to ensure the human rights of the suspect is not infringed while safeguarding the legal procedure. Therefore, arrest coercive measures can not be arbitrarily applied, must have a certain necessity, so how to review the necessity of arrest is the core content of arrest. In order to ensure the smooth progress of the proceedings, combined with the social risk to examine whether it is necessary to arrest, in the process of examination and arrest to grasp the balance between human rights and restrictions. It is not difficult to see. We should examine the necessity of arrest from three aspects, namely, the condition of evidence, the condition of punishment and the condition of social danger, and the examination of evidence and condition of penalty is relatively easy to grasp. However, there are some problems in the examination of the condition of social risk. The factors of social risk are not specific and ununified, although the revised criminal procedure law has refined the condition of social risk. However, there is still a certain degree of fuzziness, and it is difficult to grasp it, which will vary with the personnel handling the case. Under the influence of the traditional concept of handling cases and the judicial idea, "the constitution of crime is arrest". The idea of "using arrest as agent" and "using arrest as substitute punishment" still affects the present work of arrest examination. When investigating a case, the investigating organ often pays attention to the collection of factual evidence in the case. In the procuratorial practice, although the necessity of examining arrest has become the necessity of case review. However, whether the necessity is often kidnapped by the attitude of the victim. How to improve the examination mechanism of the necessity of arrest should be from the risk assessment of social risk, the way of investigation and evidence collection, the system of hearing opinions of the procuratorial organ. In order to make the necessary mechanism of arrest more perfect and smooth, the system of not arresting and reasoning, interrogating the suspects, the public concept of the rule of law, the alternative measures of detention, the scientific evaluation mechanism and so on. More conducive to find the best balance between the protection of the proceedings and the protection of human rights. In short, no matter how the necessity of arrest review mode operation, the necessity of arrest review. It is necessary for the case handlers to have a high inner determination and good professional quality. The judiciary has a sense of justice in mind and deduces and adjudicates the established rules according to the changing judicial practice and the specific facts of the case.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.2
，

本文编号：1444586