台湾地区监听制度新近改革质评

发布时间：2018-01-22 00:37

本文关键词： 监听技术侦查比例原则令状主义通讯自由权隐私权　出处：《甘肃社会科学》2016年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：监听属于一种新型的强制处分,在便捷案件侦办的同时,也会侵犯公民的通讯秘密自由权及隐私权。此项权力的启动运行应严格限制,事后应给予受监察人有效救济。台湾地区于2014年对原有监听制度进行了再次改革,其改革动向值得关注。此次监听制度改革进步意义明显,内容涉及监听所获取另案证据的使用、监听执行的监督、违法监听证据排除法则等重大问题。大陆地区在2012年新刑诉法中正式规定了技术侦查措施,但存在单向授权特征明显、权力制衡不足、救济途径缺位等不利人权保障之弊。鉴于两岸同根同源,拥有共同的文化基础,台湾地区法治发展经验无疑更具借鉴性。在监听制度完善中,应当积极借鉴台湾地区修法的成功经验,同时要避免修法中的不彻底、不到位甚至对
[Abstract]:Listening is a new type of compulsory punishment, which can violate citizens' freedom of communication secret and privacy while convenient case investigation. The start-up of this right should be strictly restricted. Effective relief should be given to the supervisor after the event. In 2014, the original monitoring system was reformed again in Taiwan, and its reform trend is worthy of attention. The reform of the surveillance system is of great significance. The content involves the use of the evidence obtained by the monitoring of another case, monitoring the implementation of supervision, illegal surveillance evidence exclusion rules and other major issues. Mainland China in 2012 in the new Criminal procedure Law formally stipulated the technical investigation measures. However, there are disadvantages of human rights protection, such as obvious one-way authorization, insufficient checks and balances of power, lack of relief channels, etc. In view of the same root of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, they share the same cultural foundation. The experience of the development of the rule of law in Taiwan is undoubtedly more referential. In the improvement of the monitoring system, we should actively learn from the successful experience of the revision of the law in Taiwan, and at the same time, we should avoid the incompleteness and imperfection of the revision of the law.
【作者单位】：四川大学法学院;甘肃政法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目“审判中心主义改革进程中检察权同步司法化研究”(项目编号:15BFX062)成果
【分类号】：D925.2
【正文快照】：

【参考文献】