认罪认罚从宽制度若干问题探讨

发布时间：2018-02-01 07:48

本文关键词： 认罪认罚从宽适用范围证明标准检察监督　出处：《河南社会科学》2016年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在刑事速裁程序试点的基础上,认罪认罚从宽制度正式进入试点环节,成为我国当前司法改革的最新创举。在认罪认罚从宽制度的案件适用范围上,原则上不作限制,但对重罪尤其是死刑案件应当慎重、严格适用。应当结合已有经验与本次试点的预期目标,对认罪、认罚、从宽各自的内涵及其内在的逻辑关系、功能安排作出准确的理解和适用。在诉讼证明问题上,应当强调证明有罪的责任及主体并未改变,程序的简化不影响法定证明标准的遵守。在发挥检察监督职能时,应着眼于侦查阶段不宜适用认罪认罚从宽制度,并强化内部的检察监督措施。
[Abstract]:On the basis of the trial of the criminal quick adjudication procedure, the leniency system of guilty pleading and penalizing formally enters the pilot link, and becomes the latest innovation of the current judicial reform in our country, and in the case scope of application of the lenient system of guilty pleading and penalizing. In principle, there are no restrictions, but the felony, especially the death penalty cases should be carefully, strictly applied... should be combined with the experience and the expected objectives of this pilot, guilty, admission of punishment. Broadening their connotations and their inherent logical relations, the functional arrangements to make an accurate understanding and application. On the issue of proof of litigation, it should be emphasized that the responsibility to prove guilt and the subject has not changed. The simplification of the procedure does not affect the observance of the statutory standard of proof. When exercising the function of procuratorial supervision, the lenient system of guilty admission and punishment should not be applied in the investigation stage, and the internal procuratorial supervision measures should be strengthened.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学刑事司法学院;
【分类号】：D925.2
【正文快照】： 一、问题的提出 2012年,根据第十一届全国人民代表大会第五次会议《关于修改〈中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法〉的决定》,《刑事诉讼法》迎来首次大修正,并确立了普通程序与简易程序二者并列的审判程序。在实践操作中,对于被告人自愿认罪并同意适用简易程序的案件,基层法院将简易

【相似文献】