“先刑后民”原则例外性研究

发布时间：2018-02-12 15:17

本文关键词： 刑民交叉先刑后民先民后刑刑民并行　出处：《华东政法大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在司法实践中，常出现刑事案件和民事案件发生竞合的情形。长期以来，实务上针对该类案件主要以“先刑后民”为模式处理。尽管“先刑后民”已成为事实上的指导原则，但立法上并无明确规定。同时随着商品经济的发展，该处理模式逐渐不能满足部分刑民交叉类案件的需求，使得当事人的合法权益不能得到及时的救济和充分的保障，法律的权威也受到损害。鉴于理论界和司法实践中对刑民交叉案件的认知不一，本文对该类案件进行重新定义和划分，并试图从法理基础上质疑“先刑后民”处理模式的合理性，同时从司法现状的典型案例中分析该处理模式的现实问题，提出刑民交叉类案件的例外处理模式。此外，本文运用比较法的方式将域外的刑民交叉案件模式进行借鉴，由此大胆设想我国刑民交叉案件的例外处理模式。本文总共分为五部分：第一章主要在现有的学术观点的基础上对刑民交叉案件进行重新定义，并依据表现形式将其类型化；同时结合我国现有的司法解释和司法实践，对处理刑民交叉案件的模式进行了归纳总结，分别为：“先刑后民”、“先民后刑”、“刑民并行”。第二章则主要对“先刑后民”处理模式的法规条例进行梳理，从该处理模式长期存在的成因角度分析其法理基础的不足。此外，，通过对司法现状该处理模式的滥用分析其存在的现实问题。第三章则从理论基础和现实需要两方面对“先刑后民”处理模式进行例外评析。第四章运用比较法的研究方式将域外处理刑民交叉案件的模式进行列举，如刑事附带民事诉讼处理模式和刑民诉讼分开审理模式，从中获得对我国刑民交叉案件处理模式的启示。第五章通过对“先刑后民”例外模式的设想，提出具体模式的证明和证明标准以及对事实认定的处理，为解决刑民交叉案件提供一些建议，为我国刑民交叉案件的妥善解决和处理提供思路。
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, criminal cases often coincide with civil cases. For a long time, in practice, this kind of cases is mainly dealt with in the mode of "first punishment before people", although "first punishment before people" has become a de facto guiding principle. At the same time, with the development of commodity economy, the model can not meet the needs of some criminal cases, which makes the legitimate rights and interests of the parties can not be timely relief and adequate protection. The authority of the law has also been damaged. In view of the different cognition of cross-criminal cases in theory and judicial practice, this paper redefines and classifies such cases. It also tries to question the rationality of the treatment mode of "first punishment before people" on the basis of jurisprudence, at the same time, analyzes the practical problems of this mode from the typical cases of judicial status, and puts forward the exceptional handling mode of cross-type cases of criminal and civilian. This article uses the method of comparative law to draw lessons from the mode of extra-territorial criminal and civilian cross cases, thus boldly conceive the exceptional handling mode of criminal and civil cross cases in our country. This paper is divided into five parts:. The first chapter mainly redefines the cross-criminal cases based on the existing academic viewpoints, and classifies them according to their forms of expression; at the same time, combined with the existing judicial interpretation and judicial practice in China, This paper sums up the modes of dealing with the cross cases of criminal and civilian, which are as follows: first punishment after people "," foreman after punishment "," parallel between criminal and civilian ". The second chapter mainly combs the laws and regulations of the "first punishment before the people" treatment model, and analyzes the deficiency of its legal basis from the point of view of the causes of the long-term existence of the treatment model. Through the abuse of the handling mode of the judicial status quo, it analyzes the existing practical problems. The third chapter makes an exception analysis on the treatment mode of "first punishment before people" from two aspects: theoretical basis and practical need. Chapter 4th enumerates the modes of extra-territorial handling of cross-criminal cases, such as the mode of handling criminal incidental civil proceedings and the mode of separate trial of criminal proceedings. From this, we can get the enlightenment to the mode of dealing with the cross-cases of criminal and civilian in our country. Chapter 5th, through the assumption of the exceptional mode of "first sentence before the people", puts forward the proof and proof standard of the specific model and the handling of the fact, and provides some suggestions for solving the cross-criminal cases. To provide ideas for the proper resolution and handling of cross-criminal cases in China.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】