电子数据的司法运用研究
发布时间:2018-02-14 15:09
本文关键词: 电子数据 证据收集 证据出示 网络公证 出处:《甘肃政法学院》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:现如今随着科技的不断发展,互联网已经成为我们日常生活与商业往来的一部分,逐渐深入到人们生活的各个领域。与此同时,随之而来的高科技犯罪也在不断增加,犯罪形式不再仅限于普通的模式,逐步发展为技术性高、专业性强的网络犯罪模式。所以,在司法实践中,如何收集并运用网络犯罪中的电子数据证据,就是现如今司法机关面临的主要问题。自从我国2012年修订颁布了新《刑事诉讼法》之后,在证据种类里,电子数据被正式列入法律条文,这对于我国的法制建设是一个重要的进步,对于实践中司法机关对电子数据的运用提供了良好的法律环境。但是,由于我国对于此类型证据的立法相对还不够完善,实践中各司法机关在具体操作过程中还缺乏详细的规制,所以,对电子数据的研究,是司法实践的需要,同时也是证据制度发展的必然趋势。本文重点围绕司法实践中电子数据的运用问题进行了探讨,首先对电子数据进行了整体的论述,对于其自身的定义和分类归属阐述了自己的观点,其次对电子数据的收集、出示、质证、保全进行了分析,并详细针对公安机关、检察机关、法院以及网络通讯服务第三方如何运用好电子数据问题进行了具体分析,最后作者对电子数据的救济机制问题提出了自己的建议。希望本篇文章对电子数据的研究有所帮助。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, with the development of science and technology, the Internet has become a part of our daily life and business contact, and it has gradually penetrated into every field of people's life. At the same time, the high-tech crime has been increasing. The form of crime is no longer limited to the ordinary pattern, and gradually develops into a highly technical and professional network crime pattern. Therefore, in judicial practice, how to collect and use the electronic data evidence in the network crime, That is, the main problem facing the judiciary today. Since China revised and promulgated the new Criminal procedure Law in 2012, in the category of evidence, electronic data has been formally included in the legal provisions. This is an important progress in the construction of legal system in our country and provides a good legal environment for the judicial organs to use electronic data in practice. However, because our legislation on this type of evidence is relatively imperfect, In practice, the judicial organs still lack detailed regulation in the specific operation process, so the research on electronic data is the need of judicial practice. At the same time, it is also an inevitable trend of the development of evidence system. This paper focuses on the application of electronic data in judicial practice. Regarding its own definition and classification, this paper expounds its own viewpoint. Secondly, it analyzes the collection, presentation, cross-examination and preservation of electronic data. It also makes a detailed analysis of the public security organs and procuratorial organs. The court and the third party of network communication service have made a concrete analysis on how to make good use of electronic data. Finally, the author has put forward his own suggestion on the relief mechanism of electronic data. I hope this article will be helpful to the research of electronic data.
【学位授予单位】:甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘广三;向德超;;论电子证据的搜查、扣押[J];北方法学;2007年02期
2 胡惠生;浅论香港的《电子交易条例》[J];北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版);2001年02期
3 乔雄兵;;美国电子证据开示变革及对我国的启示[J];北京理工大学学报(社会科学版);2012年01期
4 张彩云;网络犯罪中电子证据有关问题之探析[J];当代法学;2003年07期
5 刘品新;论电子证据的定位——基于中国现行证据法律的思辨[J];法商研究;2002年04期
6 刘品新;;电子取证的法律规制[J];法学家;2010年03期
7 董庆华;刘清春;;民事诉讼中手机短信的证据使用问题分析[J];法制与经济(下旬);2010年03期
8 曹小妹;;浅析检察机关对电子数据证据的审查[J];法制与经济(中旬);2012年08期
9 邵跻;;刑事诉讼电子证据保全刍议[J];法制与社会;2013年13期
10 许榕生;;国际计算机取证的操作规程标准化动态[J];金融电子化;2003年09期
,本文编号:1510980
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1510980.html