附条件不起诉监督考察的主体:基于参与观察的研究

发布时间：2018-02-21 02:28

本文关键词： 附条件不起诉监督考察处分主体参与主体未成年人参与观察　出处：《国家检察官学院学报》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：附条件不起诉监督考察是一项完全不同于传统办案审查证据和适用法律的社会化的工作,也是一个多方主体参与互动的过程。检察机关作为处分主体,承担的三重职能之间存在角色冲突。监护人履行职责严重不足,司法社工更多担任了信息传递者和日常监管者的角色,观护单位参与的规范程度较低并与监督考察要求的严格性存在矛盾,社会主体参与面临多样性不足的困境。根据儿童参与原则,未成年人应是监督考察的主体。考察帮教小组在整体应对方面的合力尚未充分显现,主体之间存在信息分享不畅与缺乏合作的状况,各方主体还可能因为立场、理念等的不同存在认识上的差异。参与观察描述了各方主体定位与互动合作的真实图景,为思考发展方向提供了经验事实的基础。
[Abstract]:Conditional non-prosecution supervision and inspection is a completely different from the traditional case review evidence and the application of the law of the socialization of work, is also a multi-subject interactive process, procuratorial organs as the main punishment, There is a conflict of roles between the three functions undertaken. The guardian is seriously inadequate in performing his duties, and the judicial social workers are more likely to play the roles of information communicator and daily supervisor. The participation of observation and nursing units is of low normative degree and contradictory with the strict requirements of supervision and inspection, and the participation of social subjects is faced with the dilemma of insufficient diversity. According to the principle of children's participation, Minors should be the subject of supervision and inspection. The resultant force of the inspection help and education group in the overall response has not been fully manifested. There is a situation of poor information sharing and lack of cooperation among the subjects, and the main bodies of all parties may also be due to their positions. The participating observation describes the real picture of the orientation of the parties and the interaction and cooperation, and provides the basis of the empirical facts for thinking about the direction of development.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院;
【基金】：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究课题(16 SFB3027)“二元视角下附条件不起诉制度研究”成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】