我国刑事简易审判程序研究

发布时间：2018-02-28 21:10

本文关键词： 简易审判程序公正效率完善　出处：《河北大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：为了缓解案多人少司法资源紧张的压力,提高诉讼效率,进一步平衡与协调公正与效率价值。我国在1996年《刑事诉讼法》中增设了简易审判程序,从此拉开了我国刑事简易审判程序的序幕。为了更好的适应不断变化了的实际情况,2012年我国又对《刑事诉讼法》进行了大幅度的修改,对刑事简易审判程序此章做了重大改革。应当看到,现行《刑事诉讼法》虽然对简易审判程序做了进一步完善,但仍然在立法设计和适用上存在诸多问题,诸如类型比较单一;适用条件的规定过于笼统;对被告人相关诉权的保障性规定不足;适用率仍然比较低和审判执行环节问题突出等。因此,从在保障公正的前提下进一步提高诉讼效率和有效实现诉讼公正价值和诉讼效率价值的相互协调与平衡的角度出发,我国刑事简易审判程序仍有需要再完善和创新的空间。同时,通过对两大法系刑事简易审判程序的考察和分析可以看到,多元化已经成为各国刑事简易审判程序的普遍特点和发展趋势。基于此,笔者建议我国应借鉴国外在简易审判程序方面的先进理念,在完善我国现行刑事简易审判程序的基础上,构建我国多元化的刑事简易审判程序,尤其应当尽快确立认罪认罚从宽程序以及中国式的处罚令制度等,从而有效平衡效率与公正两大价值目标;平衡被告人、被害人和国家之间的利益;平衡刑罚惩罚犯罪与保障人权两大目的。
[Abstract]:In order to relieve the pressure of more cases and fewer judicial resources, to improve the efficiency of litigation, to further balance and coordinate the value of justice and efficiency, in 1996, our country added the summary trial procedure in the Criminal procedure Law. Since then, the prologue of our country's criminal summary trial procedure has been opened. In order to better adapt to the constantly changing actual situation, in 2012, our country also made a substantial amendment to the Criminal procedure Law. It should be seen that although the current Criminal procedure Law has made further improvement on the summary trial procedure, there are still many problems in the legislative design and application, such as the single type; The provisions of the applicable conditions are too general; the provisions on the guarantee of the defendant's related rights of action are insufficient; the rate of application is still relatively low and the problems in the execution of the trial are outstanding. From the angle of further improving the efficiency of litigation and realizing the mutual coordination and balance between the value of litigation justice and the value of litigation efficiency under the premise of safeguarding justice, There is still room for perfection and innovation in the criminal summary trial procedure in China. Meanwhile, through the investigation and analysis of the criminal summary trial procedure in the two major legal systems, we can see that. Diversification has become a common feature and development trend of summary criminal procedure in various countries. Based on this, the author suggests that our country should draw lessons from the advanced ideas of foreign countries in summary trial procedure. On the basis of perfecting the current criminal summary trial procedure in our country, we should construct the diversified criminal summary trial procedure in our country, especially, we should establish the lenient procedure of pleading guilty and penalizing as soon as possible, as well as the punishment order system of Chinese style, etc. Thus the two valuable goals of efficiency and justice are effectively balanced; the interests of the accused, the victim and the state are balanced; and the criminal punishment and the protection of human rights are balanced.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】