从程序法定主义到程序人文主义——法国民事诉讼法典的发展述评

发布时间：2018-03-05 07:10

本文选题：法国　切入点：民事诉讼　出处：《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2013年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：如果说1806年法国民事诉讼法典是一部实践技术法典,1975年法国民事诉讼法典则是一部诉讼艺术法典。1806年法典的立法者受当时诉讼理论空白的局限,忽略了对诉讼基本原则和一般规定的制定,仅为抵御法官裁量恣意制定一系列枯燥和复杂的程序规则,造成法典的法定主义和形式主义特征。1975年法典制定时,诉讼法学已处于成熟阶段。立法者在法典开篇之处规定了民事诉讼的基本原则,并且引入程序合作主义理念,改变了诉讼程序中传统的自由决斗性质,而将诉讼定义为法官和各方当事人共同合作寻求纠纷解决的领域。从20世纪末开始,法国民事诉讼法典的发展则更为强调追求纠纷的人性化解决,倡导当事人参与纠纷解决,鼓励他们基于合意寻求纠纷的协商解决,由此形成法典的新特征——程序人文主义。
[Abstract]:If the French Code of Civil procedure in 1806 is a technical code of practice, and the Code of Civil procedure of 1975 is a code of procedural art, the legislators of the Code of Civil procedure of 1806 are limited by the blank theory of litigation at that time. Neglecting the formulation of the basic principles and general provisions of the proceedings, and making only a series of dull and complex procedural rules in order to resist the arbitrary discretion of the judge, resulting in the legal and formalistic characteristics of the Code. When the Code was established in 1975, The procedural law has been in the mature stage. The legislator stipulated the basic principles of civil action at the beginning of the code, and introduced the concept of procedural cooperation, which changed the traditional nature of free duel. Since the end of 20th century, the development of French Code of Civil procedure has emphasized the pursuit of humanized dispute resolution and advocated the parties to participate in dispute resolution. They are encouraged to seek a negotiated settlement of disputes based on consensus, thus forming a new feature of the Code-procedural humanism.
【作者单位】：北京理工大学法学院;
【分类号】：D956.5;D925.1

【参考文献】