公安机关行政权与刑事司法权界分实例研究

发布时间：2018-03-05 21:33

本文选题：公安机关行政职权　切入点：公安机关刑事司法权　出处：《黑龙江大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：公安机关是我国重要的行政机关，享有广泛的行政职权，又被法律赋予了刑事司法权。法律对于两种职权的制度设计十分不同，公安机关行使行政职权的行为可以被相对人提起行政诉讼，行使刑事司法权却不接受司法审查。但是，实践中两种职权因存在很多相似之处，，学界对于区分公安机关行政职权与刑事司法权的界定标准不一，而仅仅依据一种标准也很难判断。不清晰的区分标准导致两种职权经常存在混淆状态从而带来了很大的危害。本文通过对公安机关行政职权与刑事职权的对比研究，分析导致职权混淆的原因及两种职权混淆带来的危害，进而提出区分公安机关行政职权与刑事司法权的综合判断方法，力求找到更合理实用的区分标准，保护公民合法权益。
[Abstract]:The public security organ is an important executive in China, enjoys extensive administrative powers, and by law gives the criminal judicial power. The system design for the two kinds of legal authority is very different, the public security organ to exercise the administrative power behavior can be relative to the administrative proceedings, the exercise of criminal judicial power is not subject to judicial review. However, in the practice of two powers because there are many similarities between the academic circles for the distinction between the public security organs of administrative and criminal judicial definition standards, but only on the basis of a standard, it is difficult to judge. The standard does not distinguish clearly lead to two terms are often confused state which is harmful. Through comparative study the public security organs of administrative and criminal powers, causing confusion causes analysis of two kinds of powers and authority confusion brought, and then put forward the distinction between public security organs and the punishment of administrative authority The comprehensive method of judging the legal rights of the Ministry of affairs seeks to find a more reasonable and practical distinction standard and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the citizens.

【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.14;D925.2

【参考文献】