论民法上的法律错误——基于王凤霞等上诉案

发布时间：2018-03-15 08:48

本文选题：一元论　切入点：二元论　出处：《河北法学》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：对王凤霞等上诉案法院判决的学术批评,揭开了错误规则德国民法传统上的二元论与罗马—法国法、日本法民法传统上的一元论论争的序幕。必须指出,一元论学者的批判存在罗马法文献考证不规范以及论证不严谨的弊病,以此为契机建构的一元论学术大厦,不仅基础概念的界定根基不牢,建构于其上的民法错误规则也摇摇欲坠,且在实际上解构了其基础概念。应承认身份关系领域,尤其是婚姻、遗嘱、监护、收养领域内错误规则的特殊性,建构一个区分身份关系领域与合同领域的民法上的法律错误概念分类与区分规则体系。合同领域的法律错误规则应坚持德国民法传统上二元论,厘定"法律"为任意法规范,区分建构法律上的内容错误与动机错误的不同撤销权机制。
[Abstract]:Wang Fengxia and other appeals court ruling on the academic criticism, uncover the dualism of error rule in German civil law traditionally with Rome, France, Japan's traditional prelude to civil law. It must be pointed out that the monism of debate, criticism of scholars of the disadvantages of Rome law monism of textual norms and the demonstration is not rigorous, construction as an opportunity the monism of academic buildings not only basic concept, the foundation is not strong, the civil law rules of error on the construction of crumbling, and in fact the deconstruction of its basic concepts. Should recognize the identity relationships, especially marriage, probate, guardianship, adoption of special field error rule, the construction of the concept of legal error classification a distinction the relationship between identity field and the field of contract law and rules system. The rules of contract law mistake areas should adhere to the traditional dualism of German civil law,% The "law" is the standard of arbitrary law, which distinguishes the different mechanism of revocation right from the construction of legal content error and motive error.

【作者单位】：昆明理工大学;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金一般项目《物债二分下的中间权利状态研究》(14BFX171)
【分类号】：D920.5;D925.1

【参考文献】