宪政视域下我国公检法关系的再思考——从杭州“二张”冤案谈起

发布时间：2018-03-21 01:41

本文选题：公检法　切入点：关系模式　出处：《中共浙江省委党校学报》2013年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：杭州"二张"冤案的曝光,让社会公众强烈感受到了我国当前司法运行体制存在的严重问题,而这又主要是囿于我国宪法和刑事诉讼法对于公检法三机关"分工负责、互相配合、互相制约"的明文规定和长期司法运行实践对这种规定的习惯性养成。公检法现存的流线型关系造成了刑事司法中的侦查中心主义、诉审职能弱化、审判不中立等一系列现实困境,已经严重危害到了我国刑事司法实践和宪政发展的顺利进行。从法治国的认知角度出发,提出"司法宪政化"的命题,打破"分工负责、互相配合、互相制约"原则下的公检法关系模式,成为了当下司法改革进程中正确的路径选择。
[Abstract]:The exposure of the "two" grievance cases in Hangzhou has made the public feel strongly that there are serious problems existing in the current judicial operation system in China, and this is mainly due to the division of responsibilities between the three organs of the Public Security Bureau, the Procuratorate and the Court due to the Constitution and the Criminal procedure Law of our country. The explicit provisions of mutual cooperation and mutual restriction and the practice of judicial operation over a long period of time have formed the habit of this regulation. The existing streamlined relationship among the Public Security Bureau, the procuratorate and the court has resulted in the centralism of investigation in criminal justice and the weakening of the function of prosecution and trial. A series of practical difficulties, such as non-neutrality of trial, have seriously jeopardized the practice of criminal justice and the smooth development of constitutionalism in our country. From the cognitive point of view of ruling the country by law, this paper puts forward the proposition of "judicial constitutionalism" and breaks "division of labor and responsibility". The relationship model of public security bureau, procuratorate and court under the principle of mutual cooperation and restriction has become the correct path choice in the current judicial reform process.
【作者单位】：浙江工商大学法学院;
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】