论“服刑中止”制度

发布时间：2018-03-22 20:28

本文选题：已决犯　切入点：逮捕　出处：《中国海洋大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：对于已决犯再犯新罪或发现漏罪诉讼程序的论述在刑事理论中并不多见，尤其是当已决犯兼具犯罪嫌疑人、被告人和罪犯等多重身份时,探讨如何启动追究其新罪或者漏罪的刑事责任的诉讼程序少之甚少。司法实践中无论是诉讼程序的选取还是量刑的具体适用，归根结底有必要明确区分当事人的具体身份和所处的诉讼阶段，如不进行节点区分，将会引起侦查办案期间、羁押期间、审理期限无法明确以及刑期无法科学、合理计算，诉讼权利无法保障等现实问题。本文以“已决犯”为切入点，，分三部分展开论述：第一部分通过对“三个问题”的思考引出“服刑中止”制度存在的现实需求和价值意义；第二部分“服刑中止”制度的审视与提出，论证了该制度的必要性和合理性；第三部分详细论述了“服刑中止”制度的具体构建和程序设置。文章根据最高院“三五改革纲要”的关于建立健全贯彻宽严相济刑事政策的司法协调制度与保障制度的精神，本着实体与程序并重的理念和保障人权的需要，层层递进，逐步延伸，构建了较为全面的“服刑中止”这一全新的司法制度。即在坚持刑罚的强制性、严厉性的前提下，承认刑罚执行过程的客观性、复杂性和渐进性，通过必要时中止正在进行的刑罚，留待将来中止条件消失后继续进行这一制度设计，来实现法律精神和客观需要的契合和互补。这样不仅能清楚区分服刑期间、侦查办案期间、羁押期间、诉讼期间，还能为法官刑期清晰的计算提供方便，保障了程序正义和实体正义的实现，维护了被告人的合法权利，也体现了诉讼的经济原则，同时对于弥补现有刑罚执行制度的短板亦大有裨益，为刑事诉讼的修改提供一个新的视野。
[Abstract]:It is rare in criminal theory to discuss the procedure for a convicted offender to repeat a new crime or to discover a missing crime, especially when a convicted offender has multiple identities such as suspect, defendant and criminal, etc. How to start the criminal responsibility for new crimes or omissions is very few. In judicial practice, whether the selection of litigation procedures or the specific application of sentencing, In the final analysis, it is necessary to make a clear distinction between the specific identity of the parties and the litigation stage. If no distinction is made between the nodes, it will lead to the investigation and handling of cases, the detention period, the uncertainty of the trial period, and the lack of scientific and reasonable calculation of the term of the sentence. The thesis is divided into three parts: the first part leads to the realistic demand and value meaning of the system of "suspension of sentence" through the consideration of "three issues"; The second part examines and puts forward the system of "sentence suspension", and proves the necessity and rationality of the system. The third part discusses the concrete construction and procedure setup of "sentence suspension" system in detail. According to the spirit of establishing and perfecting judicial coordination system and guarantee system of carrying out the criminal policy of leniency and severe punishment in the "three five year Reform outline" of the Supreme Court, In line with the concept of equal emphasis between entity and procedure and the need to protect human rights, the new judicial system of "suspension of sentence", which is a relatively comprehensive judicial system, has been constructed step by step and gradually extended, that is, under the premise of insisting on the mandatory and severe nature of punishment, Recognizing the objectivity, complexity and progressiveness of the process of execution of penalties, by suspending ongoing penalties, if necessary, and leaving the design of the system to continue after the conditions of suspension have disappeared in the future, To realize the compatibility and complementarity between the legal spirit and the objective needs. In this way, not only can we clearly distinguish between the period of serving a sentence, the period of investigation, the period of custody, the period of litigation, but also provide convenience for the judge to calculate his sentence clearly. It not only guarantees the realization of procedural justice and substantive justice, maintains the legal rights of defendants, but also embodies the economic principle of litigation. To provide a new perspective for the revision of criminal proceedings.
【学位授予单位】：中国海洋大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924;D925.2

【参考文献】