认罪认罚从宽程序中的潜在风险及其防范

发布时间：2018-03-24 01:25

本文选题：认罪认罚从宽程序　切入点：风险防范　出处：《当代法学》2017年05期

【摘要】：认罪认罚从宽程序以犯罪嫌疑人、被告人认罪为基础,以诉讼程序简化为特征,其正当性取决于认罪是否具有自愿性和真实性。然而现阶段我国认罪认罚从宽程序面临着较高的非自愿认罪风险和虚假认罪风险。导致非自愿认罪风险存在的原因包括非法侦查讯问行为的存在、律师帮助权的缺位和证据先悉权的缺陷等;导致虚假认罪风险存在的原因则包括被追诉人的主观原因、审讯策略和技术的运用、无罪判决率畸低、无效的律师帮助等。欲有效防范这些风险的发生,需要在审前阶段确立反对强迫自我归罪特权、建立律师有效帮助机制、保障认罪前的证据先悉权,也需要在审判阶段建立专门的认罪审查程序、确立判决前的反悔机制以及完善上诉制度。
[Abstract]:The lenient procedure of pleading guilty and penalizing is based on the plea of guilt of the suspect and the defendant, and is characterized by the simplification of the procedure. Its legitimacy depends on whether the plea of guilty is voluntary and truth.However, at present, the lenient procedure of pleading guilty and penalizing in our country is facing higher risk of involuntary confession and false admission of guilt, which leads to the existence of the risk of involuntary plea of guilt. Because of the existence of illegal investigation and interrogation, The absence of the lawyer's right to help and the defects of the right to know the evidence first, the reasons for the existence of the risk of false confession include the subjective reasons of the accused, the application of interrogation strategies and techniques, and the abnormally low rate of acquittal. To effectively prevent the occurrence of these risks, it is necessary to establish the privilege of opposing forced self-incrimination at the pretrial stage, to establish an effective aid mechanism for lawyers, and to guarantee the right to know the evidence before pleading guilty. It is also necessary to establish a special procedure of guilty plea review in the trial stage, to establish a remorse mechanism before judgment and to perfect the appeal system.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院;
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】