中国刑事强制措施改革研究

发布时间：2018-03-29 13:20

本文选题：强制措施　切入点：法治　出处：《内蒙古大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：关于刑事强制措施,中国刑事诉讼法的规定与外国大多数国家的立法有很大不同。很多法治国家对强制措施实施的对象犯罪嫌疑人、被告人同时也赋予了宪法性权利,除对适用条件、期限、程序上作出了明确规定外,同时赋予他们在被实施刑事强制措施后寻求救济的途径,这在根本上保障了刑事强制措施作为一种诉讼保障措施而存在的法律意义。反观中国刑事诉讼法,虽然从1979年颁布以来经历了两次司法改革并且在同犯罪作斗争中过程发挥了积极作用,但我们同时也应该看到中国刑事强制措施存在的弊端。要完善中国刑事强制措施制度,首先要厘清中国刑事强制措施制度改革的整体思路,遵循刑事强制措施的基本原则,笔者的建议是完善刑事强制措施体系,建立、健全刑事强制措施过程中的权利救济机制。最后要对中国刑事强制措施制度进行具体之构造,主要从刑事强制措施对人的强制措施、对物的强制措施、对隐私权的强制措施入手,建立留置盘问、“双规”,完善拘传、逮捕、取保候审,取消监视居住的对人的强制措施；增加搜查与扣押对物的强制措施；将侦听、截取通讯、电子监控及秘密拍照或录像等侦查手段作为定案证据的对隐私权的强制措施。
[Abstract]:With regard to criminal coercive measures, the provisions of China's Criminal procedure Law are very different from the legislation of most foreign countries. In many countries governed by the rule of law, criminal suspects and defendants have also been given constitutional rights in the implementation of coercive measures. In addition to making clear provisions on the conditions, duration and procedure of application, they are also given the means to seek redress after being subjected to criminal coercive measures. This fundamentally guarantees the legal significance of criminal coercive measures as a kind of procedural safeguard. In contrast, China's Criminal procedure Law, Although we have experienced two judicial reforms since its promulgation in 1979 and played a positive role in the struggle against crime, we should also see the drawbacks of China's criminal coercive measures. First of all, it is necessary to clarify the overall thinking of the system reform of criminal coercive measures in China and follow the basic principles of criminal coercive measures. The author's suggestion is to perfect the system of criminal coercive measures and establish them. Perfect the mechanism of right relief in the process of criminal coercive measures. Finally, we should construct the system of criminal coercive measures in China, mainly from the coercive measures of criminal coercive measures against people, against material measures, Starting with the coercive measures of privacy, establishing lien and questioning, "double rules," perfecting arrest, arrest, and bail pending trial, cancelling coercive measures against persons under surveillance and residence; increasing the coercive measures for searching and seizing objects; and intercepting and intercepting communications, Electronic surveillance and secret camera or video detection techniques as conclusive evidence of privacy enforcement measures.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【共引文献】