论违法性继承理论在我国的适用

发布时间：2018-03-30 21:51

本文选题：附带性审查　切入点：违法性继承　出处：《郑州大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：违法性继承发生在存在数个具有法定先后顺序的行政行为的情形下,法院能否基于在先的行政行为的违法性,撤销在后的行政行为。源于德国的这一理论,经由战后日本的发展,形成以违法性截断与违法性继承并存的通说并发展了实体判断与程序保障的判断基准。随着社会的发展,行政效能的发挥对行政机关提出越来越高的要求,多部门参与、多种行政手段并用、多部门、多主体联合逐渐成为常态。面对日益复杂的行政行为,司法机关在关联行政行为的判决上呈现的问题逐渐表露。违法性继承理论对于法律适用上解决此类问题具有深远的现实意义。笔者从行政诉讼判例出发,摘取诸多涉及对关联行政行为审查的典型案例意在阐明我国法院在判例中并未直接触及这一学说,偶有案例遵循违法性继承理论的路径也具有很强的偶然性。但笔者认为司法机关在审判实务中面对关联行政行为的审查这一情况时,从审判路径上讲,违法性继承理论是无法逾越的理论支持之一,违法性继承理论的引入并加以转化适用具有十分重要的现实意义。不同的法院根据对行政行为可争讼性的不同维度的理解,对行政行为公定力的权衡,斟酌法安定性与对实质正义的追求,运用审判技术,做出不同的判决结果,这显然与当下司法统一法律适用标准,确保法律统一适用的时代要求,维护司法公信力的号召相背离。在讨论国内学者相关研究的基础上,加之对日本相关问题的梳理,笔者从违法性继承的射程、判断基准、构成要素入手以期对该理论有较深入的把握,在我国现行的行政诉讼制度框架内,根据新修订的《行政诉讼法》所创设的条件提出司法适用该理论的可行路径。
[Abstract]:Illegal inheritance occurs in the presence of several administrative acts with legal order, the court can be based on the illegality of the first administrative act, the revocation of the latter administrative act.The theory originated from Germany, through the development of postwar Japan, formed the general theory of illegal truncation and illegal inheritance, and developed the criterion of substantive judgment and procedural guarantee.With the development of the society, the development of administrative efficiency puts forward higher and higher requirements for administrative organs, multi-sector participation, the use of various administrative means, multi-sector, multi-subject union gradually become the normal.In the face of the increasingly complex administrative acts, the judicial organs in the related administrative acts of judgment presents problems gradually revealed.The theory of illegal inheritance has profound practical significance for the application of law to solve such problems.Starting from the administrative litigation case, the author extracts many typical cases involving the examination of the related administrative act to clarify that the court in our country has not directly touched this theory in the case law.Occasional cases follow the path of illegal inheritance theory and have strong contingency.However, the author thinks that when the judicial organs are faced with the examination of related administrative acts in judicial practice, the theory of illegal inheritance is one of the insurmountable theoretical supports from the perspective of trial path.It is of great practical significance to introduce and transform the theory of illegal inheritance.According to the understanding of different dimensions of litigability of administrative act, the balance of public power of administrative act, the consideration of law stability and the pursuit of substantive justice, different courts make different judgment results by using trial technology.This obviously deviates from the call to unify the legal standards, ensure the uniform application of the law and maintain the judicial credibility.On the basis of discussing the relevant research of domestic scholars, and combing the related problems in Japan, the author proceeds from the range of illegal inheritance, the criterion of judgment, the constituent elements in order to have a deeper grasp of the theory.According to the conditions created by the newly revised Administrative procedure Law, a feasible way for judicial application of this theory is put forward within the framework of the current administrative litigation system in China.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.3

【相似文献】