职务犯罪强制性侦查措施适用问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-31 17:43

本文选题：侦查　切入点：强制措施　出处：《华南理工大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：强制性侦查措施与任意性侦查措施相对，意指侦查机关为搜集犯罪证据和查获犯罪嫌疑人而对相对人采取的强制性侦查行为，包括了我国刑事诉讼法上规定的强制措施和具有强制性的查明案件事实、搜集、保全证据的侦查行为。鉴于强制措施成为独立的研究对象，多年来已较为广泛深入的研究，本课题将重点研究强制措施以外尚未深入研究的其他强制性侦查措施的监督问题。由于这些强制性侦查措施是对公民相关权利的限制或剥夺，在实践中一旦滥用就容易导致侵害公民合法权益，必须予以监督制约。强制性侦查措施具有强制性、易侵权性、适用的严格性等基本特征，其种类，依据针对的客体不同可分为对人身体的强制性措施、对物的强制性措施、对稳私权的强制性措施；依据适用范围可分为普通侦查措施和特殊侦查措施，前者指侦查各种犯罪均可适用的侦查措施，后者指只能在侦查符合一定种类或条件的犯罪时方可适用的措施。虽然强制性侦查措施存在侵犯公民基本权益的潜在风险，但从惩罚犯罪、维护社会秩序、被害人人权保障以及实施犯罪行为的嫌疑人需有一定忍受强制措施和刑罚的义务的角度来看，强制性侦查措施有其正当性。强制性侦查措施在严格遵循法定原则、比例原则、审查原则等相关的制度规定和程序情况下实施，其功能和意义就不言而喻，能保障诉讼顺利进行，提高侦查效率，有效惩治犯罪，，预防继续犯罪，降低损害后果，惩戒教育罪犯和其他公民。
[Abstract]:The opposite of compulsory investigative measures and arbitrary investigative measures, which refers to the compulsory investigative actions taken by the investigative organs against the relative parties in order to collect criminal evidence and seize criminal suspects, Including the compulsory measures stipulated in the Criminal procedure Law of our country and the investigation behavior of finding out the facts of the case, collecting and preserving the evidence. In view of the fact that the coercive measures have become independent research objects, they have been studied extensively and deeply for many years. This topic will focus on the supervision of other coercive investigative measures other than coercive measures that have not yet been studied in depth. Since these coercive investigative measures are restrictions or deprivation of citizens' relevant rights, Once abused in practice, it is easy to infringe upon the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, and it must be supervised and restricted. According to the different objects, it can be divided into compulsory measures on human body, coercive measures on objects, coercive measures on stabilizing private rights, and general investigative measures and special investigative measures on the basis of the scope of application. The former refers to the investigative measures applicable to the investigation of crimes of all kinds, while the latter refers to the measures that can be applied only when the investigation of crimes of a certain type or condition meets certain conditions. Although compulsory investigative measures have the potential risk of infringing upon the basic rights and interests of citizens, But from the point of view of punishing crimes, maintaining social order, protecting the human rights of victims and the obligations of suspects who commit criminal acts to bear certain coercive measures and penalties, Coercive investigative measures have their legitimacy. The function and significance of compulsory investigative measures are self-evident when they are strictly implemented in accordance with the relevant system and procedures, such as the legal principle, the principle of proportionality, the principle of examination, etc. It can guarantee the smooth progress of the lawsuit, improve the efficiency of investigation, punish crime effectively, prevent the continuing crime, reduce the damage consequence, punish and educate the criminals and other citizens.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】