质疑仲裁裁决的理由及撤销仲裁裁决后的救济方法

发布时间：2018-04-04 04:22

本文选题：仲裁　切入点：质疑　出处：《中国海商法研究》2013年04期

【摘要】：英国和香港的仲裁法都为仲裁当事方在获得仲裁裁决后提供了三种类型的救济方式,从而能够以适当的方式对仲裁裁决进行修改、变更、发回重审,甚至在某些情况下撤销仲裁裁决或宣告仲裁裁决无效。在修改或变更裁决时,相关修改或变更将作为仲裁庭裁决的一部分而生效。当裁决被法院发回仲裁庭要求重新考虑时,仲裁庭就有责任在一定期限内就所发回的事项作出一个新的裁决。但是,由于在裁决被部分或全部地撤销或者宣告无效时,相关裁决就如同从未作出一样,也就使得原本需要仲裁的纠纷或争议处在待决状态。在这种情况下,仲裁双方当事人就需要更进一步的救济方式来继续解决相关纠纷或争议。从英国及香港仲裁法的视角,对质疑仲裁裁决的理由及撤销仲裁裁决后的救济方法加以解读,并尝试就中国法下的相关问题提供立法建议。
[Abstract]:The arbitration laws in the United Kingdom and Hong Kong provide three types of relief to the parties to the arbitration after they have obtained the arbitral award, so that the arbitral award can be modified, modified and remanded in an appropriate manner.Even in some cases the arbitral award was set aside or annulled.When amending or altering the award, the relevant modification or change shall take effect as part of the arbitral tribunal's award.When the award is sent back to the arbitral tribunal for reconsideration, the arbitral tribunal is obliged to make a new award on the matter referred back within a certain period of time.However, when the award is partially or wholly annulled or annulled, the relevant award is in a pending state as if it had never been made.In this case, the parties to the arbitration need further relief to continue to resolve the relevant disputes or disputes.From the point of view of British and Hong Kong arbitration law, this paper interprets the reasons for challenging the arbitral award and the relief methods after the revocation of the arbitral award, and tries to provide legislative advice on the relevant issues under Chinese law.
【作者单位】：礼德齐伯礼律师行;
【分类号】：D925.7

【相似文献】