论中国文书提出命令制度适用范围的扩展——以第三人文书提出义务为视角

发布时间：2018-04-11 17:52

本文选题：文书提出命令 + 民事诉讼　；参考：《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年01期

【摘要】：文书提出命令制度的确立对于提升民事诉讼当事人证据收集能力,保护其合法权益以及保证人民法院准确认定案件事实具有重要意义。中国《民诉法解释》第112条在借鉴大陆法系相关规定的基础上对该项制度作出了规定,但相较大陆法系有关立法例,中国对于该项制度的设计还存有缺陷,其中最突出的就是中国文书提出命令制度的适用范围规定得过于狭窄,仅将当事人纳入了文书提出义务主体的范围,而忽略了对诉讼外第三人的考量。因此,有必要借鉴域外关于第三人文书提出义务的立法经验,以对中国文书提出命令制度的主体范围进行必要的扩展,从而尽快在中国确立案外第三人的文书提出义务。
[Abstract]:The establishment of the system of filing orders is of great significance to enhance the ability of the parties to collect evidence, to protect their legitimate rights and interests and to ensure that the people's court can accurately identify the facts of the case.Article 112 of China's interpretation of Civil procedure Law provides for this system on the basis of drawing lessons from the relevant provisions of the civil law system. However, compared with the relevant legislative examples of the civil law system, China still has some defects in the design of the system.The most prominent one is that the scope of application of the order system in China is too narrow, only the parties are included in the scope of the subject of the obligation of the document, but the consideration of the third party outside the lawsuit is ignored.Therefore, it is necessary to draw lessons from the foreign legislative experience on the obligation of the third party in order to expand the scope of the subject of the order system of the document in China, so as to establish the obligation of the third party outside the case in China as soon as possible.
【作者单位】：重庆大学法学院;西南政法大学;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“协作式民事取证规则制度化研究”(13BFX070) 重庆大学中央高校基本科研业务费重点项目(CQDXWL-2013-Z021) 浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题(12JCFX09YB)
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】