合并仲裁与合并开庭问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-16 14:25

本文选题：合并仲裁 + 合并开庭　；参考：《大连海事大学》2015年博士论文

【摘要】：本文第一章主要介绍了合并仲裁与合并开庭的概念,并对相似概念进行了评析,分析了二者之间的关系,梳理了合并仲裁与合并开庭的发展历程。第二章分析了合并仲裁与合并开庭的优势与困境。优势主要包括避免出现不一致的仲裁裁决,保障公平,节约仲裁资源,提高仲裁效率等。困境主要是违反了当事人的意思自治,破坏了仲裁的秘密性原则,受《纽约公约》的阻碍等。第三章探讨了合并仲裁与合并开庭的仲裁规则及其立法现状,从世界上主要国家的法律规定和国际主要仲裁机构的仲裁规则出发,研究合并仲裁与合并开庭制度,且在此基础上比较分析我国法律和仲裁规则对合并仲裁与合并开庭的规定,发现我国现行法律对合并仲裁与合并开庭制度的规定处于立法空白阶段,且我国主要仲裁规则对合并仲裁与合并开庭的规定也不成体系,亟待完善。第四章研究了合并仲裁与合并开庭的仲裁规则设计,分别从合并仲裁与合并开庭的适用条件,决定权归属,仲裁员指定,仲裁裁决的作出以及与其他制度的互动等角度构建其机制。第五章研究了合并仲裁与合并开庭制度与我国仲裁立法修改的协调,先分析了合并仲裁与合并开庭在我国现有仲裁立法下的发展难点,这包括合并仲裁与合并开庭制度在我国仲裁立法下缺失法理基础,合并仲裁与合并开庭的范围无法确定,仲裁员指定较难以及仲裁裁决不易被承认与执行等。然后通过总结、借鉴英美法律协调合并仲裁、合并开庭的经验,探讨了我国仲裁立法协调解决上述难点的对应措施。
[Abstract]:The first chapter mainly introduces the concept of merger arbitration and joint court session, analyzes the similar concepts, analyzes the relationship between them, and combs the development course of merger arbitration and combined court session.The second chapter analyzes the advantages and difficulties of combined arbitration and joint court.The advantages include avoiding inconsistent arbitration awards, safeguarding fairness, saving arbitration resources and improving arbitration efficiency.The dilemma mainly violates the autonomy of the parties, undermines the secret principle of arbitration, and is obstructed by the New York Convention.The third chapter discusses the arbitration rules and the current legislative situation of the combined arbitration and the joint session. From the legal provisions of the major countries in the world and the arbitration rules of the major international arbitration institutions, the paper studies the system of the combined arbitration and the combined court session.On the basis of the comparison and analysis of the provisions of our country's laws and arbitration rules on the merger arbitration and the combined court session, it is found that the provisions of the current law of our country on the system of the combined arbitration and the combined court session are in the legislative blank stage.Moreover, the main rules of arbitration in our country are not systematic in terms of merger arbitration and combined court session, which need to be improved urgently.Chapter four studies the design of arbitration rules for combined arbitration and joint session, respectively, from the applicable conditions of combined arbitration and joint session, the ownership of the decision, the appointment of arbitrators,The mechanism of arbitration award is constructed from the angle of making arbitration award and interacting with other systems.Chapter five studies the coordination between the system of merger arbitration and the system of combined court session and the revision of arbitration legislation in our country, and analyzes the difficulties in the development of merger arbitration and combined court session under the existing arbitration legislation of our country.This includes that the system of combined arbitration and combined session lacks the legal basis under our country's arbitration legislation, the scope of combined arbitration and joint session cannot be determined, the appointment of arbitrators is difficult, and the arbitral award is not easy to be recognized and enforced.Then, by summing up, drawing lessons from the experience of coordinated and combined arbitration in Anglo-American law, this paper probes into the corresponding measures to solve the above difficulties in our country's arbitration legislation harmoniously.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.7

【相似文献】