张高平、张辉强奸案分析

发布时间：2018-04-20 23:15

本文选题：强奸罪 + 定案根据　；参考：《湖南大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：强奸是指违背妇女意志，以暴力、胁迫或者其他手段，强行与其发生性交，或者同不满14周岁的幼女发生性关系的行为。强奸行为侵犯了妇女性的不可侵犯性或者幼女的身心健康。张高平、张辉强奸案引发了大范围的争议。张高平、张辉强奸案共有两大争议焦点：一是该案被告人是否构成强奸罪，二是袁连芳的证言能否作为定案根据。对认定张高平、张辉二人是否构成犯罪，应当从强奸罪的客观方面进行分析。本案证明被告人存在强奸行为的主要证据即被告人的有罪供述，被告人的供述要成为定案根据则应当审查证据的合法性，对于口供合法性的认定必须根据非法言词证据排除规则来判断。《刑事诉讼法》中规定，由刑讯逼供等非法方法取得的被告人供述法院应当予以排除，不能作为定案根据。对认定袁连芳的证言能否作为定案的证据，首先应该从袁连芳的证言的证据能力来判断，狱内侦查是公安机关秘密侦查手段中的一种，特情人员所获情报只能认定为公安机关破案的线索，但是通过一定程序的转化也能作为公开证据使用。其次，，应从袁连芳证言的证明力来分析，从证据的来源判断袁连芳的证言属于传闻证据，同时综合全案分析袁连芳的证言属于孤证，孤证不能定案，因此，袁连芳的证言不能作为本案的定案根据。对该案争议焦点的分析，能够对我国刑事审判活动中对非法证据排除规则的理解和面对存在狱侦特情人员作证的案件处理方式起到帮助作用。
[Abstract]:Rape is an act of sexual intercourse against a woman's will, violence, coercion or other means, or sexual relations with a young girl under the age of 14. Rape violates the sexual inviolability of a woman or the physical and mental health of a young girl. The rape case of Gao Ping Zhang and Zhang Hui has caused a great deal of controversy. There are two controversial points in the rape case of Zhang Gao Ping and Zhang Hui: one is whether the defendant constitutes the crime of rape, the other is whether Yuan Lianfang's testimony can be taken as the basis of the final case. It is necessary to analyze whether Zhang Gao Ping and Zhang Hui constitute a crime from the objective aspects of the crime of rape. The case proves that the defendant has the main evidence of rape, that is, the defendant's guilty confession. In order for the defendant's confession to be conclusive, the legality of the evidence should be examined. The determination of the legality of confession must be judged according to the rule of exclusion of illegal verbal evidence. According to the Criminal procedure Law, the court of defendant's confession obtained by illegal means such as extorting confessions by torture should be excluded and can not be used as the basis of final decision. To determine whether Yuan Lianfang's testimony can be taken as final evidence, first of all, we should judge from Yuan Lianfang's evidentiary ability that the investigation in prison is one of the secret investigative techniques of the public security organs. The intelligence obtained by the special intelligence personnel can only be regarded as the clues of the public security organs to solve the case, but it can also be used as public evidence through the transformation of certain procedures. Secondly, it should be analyzed from the evidential power of Yuan Lianfang's testimony, judging from the source of the evidence that Yuan Lianfang's testimony belongs to hearsay evidence, and at the same time synthetically analyzing Yuan Lianfang's testimony belongs to solitary evidence. Yuan Lianfang's testimony could not be taken as the final basis of the case. The analysis of the controversial focus of the case can help the understanding of the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence in the criminal trial in our country and the way to deal with the cases in which the special persons of prison investigation give evidence.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】