论我国量刑程序的完善

发布时间：2018-04-20 23:40

本文选题：量刑程序 + 定罪　；参考：《海南大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：在刑事诉讼中,定罪和量刑是整个诉讼活动的中心,定罪要解决犯罪行为的定性问题,量刑则要解决刑罚问题。但是一直以来我国深受"重定罪、轻量刑"传统思想的影响,并不重视量刑程序问题,直到"许霆案"才引起人民的反思。在此之后,我国一边在司法实践中探寻摸索,一边加强关于量刑程序的立法,从而确立了相对分离的量刑程序模式。这一模式的量刑程序是我国借鉴英美法系和大陆法系两大法系,再根据我国的试点经验制定的。然而量刑程序在我国仍处于起步阶段,前进的方向茫然未知,在实践中也阻力重重,因而完善我国的量刑程序也是势在必行之举。本文运用文献资料法和比较法主要从四个部分对完善我国的量刑程序展开论述:第一部分简单介绍了量刑程序的概念和内容,对于量刑程序的概念,目前而言我国学术界和实务界还未形成通说,然后分析了我国研究量刑程序的意义,肯定了我国设立相对独立量刑程序模式的重要性。第二部分分析了量刑程序在我国的现状,既包括立法规范上的现状,也包括司法实践中的现状,着重论述了目前我国实践中量刑程序存在的问题,以更直观的方式将我国量刑程序的缺陷展示出来,为促进量刑程序完善提供方向。第三部分是对两大法系不同的量刑程序模式进行比较考察。通过对美国、英国这代表英美法系绝对分离量刑程序模式和以德国、日本为代表的大陆法系的混合量刑程序模式的介绍,分析两大法系的异同,进而得到完善我国量刑程序的启示。第四部分是完善我国量刑程序的具体构想。从加强被害人量刑过程的参与度、完善检察机关的量刑建议、加强对量刑信息的采集、确立独立的量刑证据规则、加强量刑说理这五个方面提出行之有效的举措,从而促进我国量刑程序稳步地向前迈进。
[Abstract]:In criminal procedure, conviction and sentencing are the center of the whole litigation activity. However, our country has been deeply influenced by the traditional thought of "heavy conviction, light sentencing", and does not attach importance to sentencing procedure, until "Xu Ting case" caused people's reflection. After this, our country explores in the judicial practice while strengthening the legislation on sentencing procedure, thus establishing a relatively separate sentencing procedure model. The sentencing procedure of this model is drawn up according to our country's pilot experience by drawing lessons from the common law system and the civil law system. However, sentencing procedure in our country is still in its infancy, the direction of its progress is unknown, and there are many obstacles in practice, so it is imperative to perfect the sentencing procedure in our country. In this paper, the methods of literature and comparison are used to discuss the improvement of sentencing procedure in four parts: the first part introduces the concept and content of sentencing procedure, and the concept of sentencing procedure. At present, the academic and practical circles of our country have not formed a general theory, and then analyzed the significance of studying sentencing procedure in our country, and affirmed the importance of establishing a relatively independent sentencing procedure model in our country. The second part analyzes the present situation of sentencing procedure in our country, including the current situation of legislation and regulation, and also the present situation of judicial practice, focusing on the problems existing in sentencing procedure in our country. In order to promote the perfection of sentencing procedure, the defects of sentencing procedure in our country are displayed in a more intuitive way. The third part is to compare and investigate the different sentencing procedure models of the two legal systems. This paper analyzes the similarities and differences between the two major legal systems through the introduction of the United States, Britain, which represents the Anglo-American law system, which absolutely separates the sentencing procedure model, and the continental law system, represented by Germany and Japan, as well as the mixed sentencing procedure model. And then get the enlightenment of perfecting the sentencing procedure of our country. The fourth part is the concrete conception of perfecting the sentencing procedure of our country. From the following five aspects: strengthening the participation of the victim in the sentencing process, perfecting the sentencing suggestions of the procuratorial organs, strengthening the collection of sentencing information, establishing independent rules of sentencing evidence, and strengthening the reasoning of sentencing, this paper puts forward effective measures. In order to promote the sentencing process in our country to move forward steadily.
【学位授予单位】：海南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】