论司法对国际体育仲裁的干预

发布时间：2018-04-21 12:37

本文选题：国际体育仲裁院 + 司法干预　；参考：《环球法律评论》2017年06期

【摘要】：国际体育仲裁院在解决国际体育争议方面处于权威地位,其仲裁的特殊性对仲裁协议的订立及仲裁中立性的影响一直是各国司法干预的焦点。但是,过度干预亦会影响体育规则及裁判准则的全球统一性。瑞士联邦法院居于司法干预的核心并形成了以其为主体的司法干预体系,德国允许本国运动员通过国内诉讼质疑国际体育仲裁院的做法是对这种体系的挑战,需对其正当性予以论证。在权衡司法干预的必要性与适当性时,应慎用作为一国强行法的反垄断法,而主要依赖仲裁法的权利保障机制。我国相关实践几近空白,而我国体育产业未来的发展使得相关问题不可回避,国际实践是我国建立和完善相关制度的重要借鉴。
[Abstract]:The Court of International Sports Arbitration is in an authoritative position in resolving international sports disputes. The influence of the particularity of its arbitration on the conclusion of arbitration agreement and the neutrality of arbitration has been the focus of judicial intervention in various countries. However, excessive intervention also affects the global uniformity of sports rules and referees. Germany's practice of allowing its athletes to challenge the International Court of Sports Arbitration through domestic litigation is a challenge to the Swiss Federal Court of Justice, which is at the heart of and has formed a system of judicial intervention in which it is the subject. It needs to be justified. In weighing the necessity and appropriateness of judicial intervention, the antimonopoly law, which is a compulsory law of a country, should be used with caution, and the right guarantee mechanism of arbitration law should be relied on. The related practice of our country is almost blank, and the future development of our country's sports industry makes the related problems unavoidable. International practice is an important reference for our country to establish and perfect the related system.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D916.2;D997

【相似文献】