民事诉讼第三人撤销之诉立案审查研究

发布时间：2018-04-22 18:11

本文选题：第三人撤销之诉 + 第三人撤销之诉立案审查　；参考：《内蒙古大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：为了更好地保护民事诉讼中案外第三人的合法权益,2012年修订的民事诉讼法首次提出了设置案外第三人撤销之诉制度。2015年最高人民法院民事诉讼法司法解释进一步细化了第三人撤销之诉制度。但是,第三人撤销之诉制度所突破的是生效裁判既判力的束缚,它对程序安定性、司法终局性均造成一定的侵损。因此,为了更好地平衡第三人权益的保护和既判力的维护,就需要对第三人撤销之诉程序的启动予以慎重处理,即进行高阶化、实质性的审查。实质审查并不代表实体审理,二者之间存在着很大的差异。在立案审查过程中不能以审查代替实体审理,否则在立案审查阶段就对争议的实体权利义务作出裁决,结果是剥夺了第三人的诉权。过于实质审查则触及实体审理,而过松则流于形式。我国第三人撤销之诉立案审查的完善在于实质审查,而实质审查的关键在于审查的内容和审查的标准。通过对实质审查内容和审查标准的统一,该制度在保护案外第三人合法权益的同时,同样兼顾着生效裁判的既判力,从而使第三人撤销之诉制度更具操作性和稳定性。
[Abstract]:In order to better protect the legitimate rights and interests of the third party outside the case in the civil action, the revised civil procedure law in 2012 proposed for the first time the establishment of the system of revocation of the third party outside the case. In 2015, the judicial interpretation of the civil procedure law of the Supreme people's Court was further developed. The system of third party revocation is refined. However, what the third party cancels the lawsuit system breaks through is the effective judgment res judicata restraint, it to the procedure stability, the judicial finality all causes the certain invasion damage. Therefore, in order to better balance the protection of the rights and interests of the third party and the maintenance of res judicata, it is necessary to carefully deal with the initiation of the procedure of revocation of the third party, that is, to carry out a higher order and substantive examination. Substantive examination does not represent substantive trial, and there is a great difference between them. In the process of filing and reviewing, the examination cannot replace the substantive trial, otherwise, at the stage of filing and examining, the rights and obligations of the entity in dispute can be decided, the result is that the third party's right of action is deprived. Too much substantive review touches on substantive trials, while too loose is mere formality. The perfection of the case-filing examination of the third party's revocation in our country lies in the substantive review, and the key of the substantive examination lies in the content and the standard of the examination. By unifying the content and standard of substantive review, the system not only protects the legitimate rights and interests of the third party outside the case, but also takes into account the res judicata of the effective judgment, thus making the system of revocation of the action of the third party more operational and stable.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】