刑事司法裁判的方法与限制——以“于欢案”为样本的分析

发布时间：2018-04-29 09:12

本文选题：“于欢案” + 司法裁判　；参考：《政法论丛》2017年04期

【摘要】：司法裁判的方法包括认定事实的方法和适用法律的方法。考察历史上各法学流派关于裁判方法的争论,核心在于如何看待法律规则和自由裁量权的作用。当代法治条件下,司法裁判的关键是处理好严格遵守法律规则与发扬法官主观能动性之间的关系,在法的安定性价值与法的妥当性价值之间求得平衡。"于欢案"为研究司法裁判的方法提供了典型样本。通过对"于欢案"一审判决书、二审检察意见书和二审判决书的实证分析,揭示出司法人员的法律思维及其背后的经验法则、法律逻辑和司法良知,是影响司法裁判的主要因素。
[Abstract]:The method of judicial adjudication includes the method of determining the fact and the method of applying the law. How to treat the function of the rule of law and discretion is the core of investigating the disputes about the adjudication method in different schools of law in history. Under the condition of the contemporary rule of law, the key of judicial judgment is to deal with the relationship between strictly observing the legal rules and carrying forward the subjective initiative of the judge, and to strike a balance between the value of stability of law and the value of appropriateness of law. " Yu Huan case provides a typical sample for studying the method of judicial decision. Through the empirical analysis of the judgment of the first instance of Yu Huan case, the procuratorial opinion of the second instance and the judgment of the second instance, the author reveals the legal thinking of the judicial personnel and the rules of experience, legal logic and judicial conscience behind it. It is the main factor that affects the administration of justice.
【作者单位】：河南财经政法大学;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“审判环节刑事错案实证分析与防控机制研究”(13BFX074) 河南省高校哲学社会科学基础研究重大项目“《论语》法律思想研究:从传统文化探寻中国法律的历史渊源”(2016-15) 河南省教育厅人文社科项目“依法治国视域下中国传统文化的当代价值研究”(2017-ZZJH-019)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】