民事恶意诉讼类型化研究

发布时间：2018-05-04 07:56

本文选题：民事恶意诉讼 + 虚假诉讼　；参考：《广西大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：2012年民事诉讼法修正案首次规定了恶意诉讼,但由于过于粗疏,且理论上对恶意诉讼的内涵、外延、构成要件及具体类型等问题未达成共识,导致司法实践中对民事恶意诉讼的认定以及责任的追究存在困境。笔者认为对民事恶意诉讼从类型化的视角进行研究可以解决以上难题。第一部分,民事恶意诉讼类型化研究概述。在本部分中,从学者以及司法实践中对民事恶意诉讼含义的认识,分析民事恶意诉讼的本质属性,从而界定民事恶意诉讼的概念。接着对民事恶意诉讼的性质做了分析,认为民事恶意诉讼是一种双重违法行为。最后对民事恶意诉讼类型、类型化以及域外关于民事恶意诉讼的类型做了论述。第二部分,民事恶意诉讼类型化的必要性。在本部分中,主要从司法实践中存在的困境、立法规定的缺陷以及理论研究的不足三个方面论述民事恶意诉讼类型化研究的必要性。第三部分,民事恶意诉讼类型划分的标准。首先提出确定民事恶意诉讼划分的前提条件,一方面既对民事恶意诉讼的范围进行适当的涵盖,另一方面又从限制外延的方式保障诉讼权利。其次是提出本文划分民事恶意诉讼的标准。对于民事恶意诉讼类型化的标准：首先划分民事恶意诉讼的一级标准是从有无诉权的角度进行划分,然后划分民事恶意诉讼的二级标准是在一级标准的基础上从行为表现方式进行划分。第四部分,民事恶意诉讼的具体类型。根据民事恶意诉讼中行为人是否享有诉权划分为虚假诉讼与滥用诉讼权利；根据行为的表现形式。在文章中又对具体类型的民事恶意诉讼的不同形态进行详尽分析。同时,对于司法实践中的琐碎性诉讼以及过失性的行为做出排除。第五部分,民事恶意诉讼类型化研究的价值。民事恶意诉讼类型化研究的价值首先是对准确界定其概念的影响；其次对完善民事恶意诉讼的立法价值；最后是对指导司法实践中规制民事恶意诉讼的作用。
[Abstract]:The amendment to the Civil procedure Law in 2012 provided for malicious litigation for the first time. However, due to being too careless, there was no consensus on the connotation, extension, constitutive requirements and specific types of malicious litigation in theory. In judicial practice, there are difficulties in the identification of malicious civil litigation and the investigation of liability. The author believes that the study of malicious civil litigation from the perspective of classification can solve the above problems. The first part is an overview of the classification of civil malicious litigation. In this part, from the scholars and judicial practice of the understanding of the meaning of civil malicious litigation, analysis of the nature of civil malicious litigation, so as to define the concept of civil malicious litigation. Then it analyzes the nature of the civil malicious litigation, and thinks that the civil malicious litigation is a double illegal act. Finally, the types and types of malicious civil litigation are discussed. The second part, the necessity of the classification of civil malicious litigation. In this part, the necessity of the classification of civil malicious litigation is discussed from three aspects: the dilemma in the judicial practice, the defects in the legislative provisions and the deficiency in the theoretical research. The third part, the standard of classification of civil malicious litigation. First of all, the prerequisite to determine the division of civil malicious litigation is put forward. On the one hand, the scope of civil malicious litigation is covered properly, on the other hand, the rights of litigation are protected by limiting the extension. Secondly, the author puts forward the standard of dividing the civil malicious lawsuit in this paper. For the classification of civil malicious litigation: first of all, the first level of classification of civil malicious litigation is from the point of view of whether there is a right of action. Then, the second-level standard of civil malice litigation is divided from the behavior expression mode on the basis of the first class standard. The fourth part, the specific types of civil malicious litigation. According to whether the actor enjoys the right of action in the civil malicious lawsuit, it is divided into false litigation and abuse of litigation right; according to the form of behavior. In this article, the specific types of malicious civil litigation are analyzed in detail. At the same time, the judicial practice of trivial litigation and negligent behavior to make an exclusion. The fifth part, the value of the study on the type of civil malicious litigation. The value of the study on the classification of civil malicious litigation is firstly the influence of defining its concept accurately; secondly, the legislative value of perfecting the civil malicious litigation; finally, the role of guiding judicial practice in regulating civil malicious litigation.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】