有关电子数据证据的当事人举证规则研究

发布时间：2018-05-05 06:21

本文选题：电子数据 + 证据　；参考：《广西民族大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：1946年，世界第一台计算机在美国宾夕法尼亚大学诞生，接下来的几十年电子技术发展迅猛,身边的电子产品无处不在。人们越来越感受到科技带来的方便与快捷，电子活动数量日益增加，以计算机及其网络为依托的电子数据在证明案件事实的过程中起着越来越重要的作用，由此引发一些新的纠纷形式，作为一种新型的证据----电子数据证据。国外的部分国家对电子数据进入诉讼有了相关的法律条文，有的国家已经具备自己成套的电子数据证据规则体系。我国有关电子数据证据在民事领域的研究起步较晚，长期以来我国电子数据证据迟迟未能被明确赋予合法的身份，直到最新修订的《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》将电子数据明确与书证、物证等列为证据种类之一，但理论界对电子数据证据的定义不统一，，电子数据证据的法律定位以及在民事诉讼实务中的具体运用等都存在着一定的分歧。本文致力研究电子数据证据的举证规则，从电子数据的基本概念出发，合理的界定定义电子数据证据，进一步研究电子数据证据的特殊性，从分析电子数据证据特殊性对电子数据举证规则的影响，研究我国有关电子数据证据立法的现有规定，总结不足和缺陷，提出合理的举证规则，对举证倒置情况的分析探讨，为民事诉讼证据体系的完善作出微薄贡献。
[Abstract]:In 1946, the world's first computer was born in the University of Pennsylvania, the following decades of rapid development of electronic technology, around the electronic products everywhere. More and more people feel the convenience and rapidity brought by science and technology, and the number of electronic activities is increasing. Electronic data based on computers and their networks play an increasingly important role in the process of proving the facts of cases. As a new kind of evidence-electronic data evidence, some new forms of dispute are caused. Some foreign countries have some relevant legal provisions on electronic data entry litigation, and some countries already have their own complete set of electronic data evidence rules system. The research on electronic data evidence in our country started relatively late in the civil field. For a long time, the electronic data evidence in our country has not been clearly assigned a legal identity for a long time. Until the newly revised Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China listed electronic data as one of the categories of evidence, the definition of electronic data evidence was not uniform. There are some differences in the legal orientation of electronic data evidence and its application in civil litigation practice. This paper is devoted to studying the rule of proof of electronic data evidence, starting from the basic concept of electronic data, reasonably defining and defining electronic data evidence, and further studying the particularity of electronic data evidence. Based on the analysis of the influence of the particularity of electronic data evidence on the rule of proof of electronic data, this paper studies the existing provisions on the legislation of electronic data evidence in China, summarizes the shortcomings and defects, puts forward the reasonable rules of proof, and analyzes and probes into the situation of evidence inversion. To make a meager contribution to the perfection of the evidence system in civil litigation.
【学位授予单位】：广西民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D915.13;D925.13

【参考文献】