刑事陪审中法律问题与事实问题的区分

发布时间：2018-05-05 11:35

本文选题：人民陪审员制度 + 法律问题　；参考：《中国法学》2017年01期

【摘要】：事实问题具有法律性,法律问题具有事实性,因此在理论上很难找到清晰而明确的标准准确地区分刑事陪审中的法律问题与事实问题。境外刑事陪审实践中对法律问题与事实问题之区分,主要是通过程序机制的方法明确法官和陪审员的具体职责,由此形成了一般裁定和问题清单两种不同的模式。我国刑事陪审中法律问题与事实问题的区分,既要遵循法哲学上有关诉讼中区分法律问题与事实问题的基本规律,又要充分考虑我国法律传统和司法实践等因素。
[Abstract]:The fact question has the legal nature, the legal question has the fact nature, therefore in the theory, it is very difficult to find the clear and clear standard accurately to distinguish the legal question and the fact question in the criminal jury trial. The distinction between legal issues and factual issues in the practice of overseas criminal jury is mainly to clarify the specific duties of judges and jurors by means of procedural mechanism, thus forming two different modes of general ruling and list of questions. The distinction between legal problems and factual issues in criminal jury trial in our country should not only follow the basic law of distinguishing legal issues from factual issues in legal philosophy, but also fully consider the legal tradition and judicial practice of our country.
【作者单位】：对外经济贸易大学法学院;
【基金】：国家2011计划“司法文明协同创新研究中心” 中国法学会2015年重点课题“我国刑事陪审中法律问题与事实问题的区分”[项目批准号:CLS(2015)B11]的研究成果
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】