论我国第三人撤销之诉制度的再完善

发布时间：2018-05-07 09:10

本文选题：第三人撤销之诉 + 立法体例　；参考：《山东大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：第三人撤销之诉制度与诉讼中的第三人参加制度、执行中的执行异议制度和案外人再审制度共同构成第三人的利益保障体系,对我国而言引入该制度更体现了遏制诈害诉讼的立法初衷。但在我国民诉法中对该制度的规定极其简陋,新民诉解释对此作出了补充却也没有解决一些实践中已突显的问题。为更好地发挥该制度的功效,需要对其在今后修法和司法解释中作出更加周密的规范和考量。本文主要采用归纳、比较分析的方法,整理我国关于第三人撤销之诉制度的现有法律及司法解释,分析存在的立法问题并结合司法实践中出现的适用困境,借鉴法国与台湾地区对这些问题的处理方式以及学者的观点,就规范这些问题提出了四点构想,以使我国第三人撤销之诉制度立法上更趋于规范,司法上更能发挥保护第三人利益的程序价值。本文结构上分为引言、正文、结语。正文包括三部分：第一部分对我国第三人撤销之诉制度从概念、理论基础、设立之必要性以及现有规定四个方面进行阐述；第二部分通过对比分析现有规定并结合司法调研和司法案例突显的问题,总结出我国关于第三人撤销之诉制度的立法存在体例不规范、客体纳入裁定不当、主体保障缺位以及程序选择顺位不当四个方面的问题；第三部分借鉴法国、台湾地区对上述问题的规定以及学者的观点,提出解决这些问题的四点构想以使我国对第三人撤销之诉制度的规定更加完善。
[Abstract]:The system of the third party's revocation and the third party's participation system, the execution objection system and the case retrial system constitute the third party's interest protection system. To our country, the introduction of this system reflects the legislative intention of restraining the fraud litigation. However, the stipulation of this system is extremely simple in the civil litigation law of our country, which is supplemented by the explanation of the new civil action, but it has not solved some problems that have been highlighted in practice. In order to give full play to the effectiveness of the system, it is necessary to make more detailed norms and considerations in the future revision of the law and judicial interpretation. This paper mainly adopts the methods of induction and comparative analysis to sort out the existing legal and judicial interpretations of the system of third party revocation in our country, to analyze the existing legislative problems and to combine with the difficulties of application in judicial practice. Referring to the methods of handling these problems in France and Taiwan and the viewpoints of scholars, this paper puts forward four ideas on standardizing these problems, in order to make the legislation of the third party's revocation system more standardized in our country. Judicial can play a more important role in the process of protecting the interests of the third party. This paper is divided into introduction, text and conclusion. The text includes three parts: the first part of the third party revocation system from the concept, theoretical basis, the necessity of establishment and the existing provisions of four aspects; In the second part, by comparing and analyzing the existing regulations and combining with the judicial investigation and judicial cases to highlight the problems, the author concludes that the legislation of the third party revocation system in our country is not standardized, and the object is not properly brought into the adjudication. The third part draws lessons from the regulations of France and Taiwan and the viewpoints of scholars. This paper puts forward four ideas to solve these problems in order to perfect the system of third party revocation in our country.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】