论我国轻微刑事案件速裁程序的问题与完善
发布时间:2018-05-16 12:50
本文选题:刑事速裁 + 权利保障 ; 参考:《青岛大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:“惩罚犯罪的刑罚越是迅速和及时,就越是公正和有益。”公正与迅速的解决案件,也一直是我们刑事司法的不懈追求。而轻微刑事案件速裁程序在保障被追诉人的迅速审判权和提高诉讼效率的同时,能够有助于解决当前我国犯罪高发状态下高羁押率和超期羁押的“司法顽疾”。在国外,特别是美国、日本、德国等国家都已经相继建立起了具有本国特色的刑事速裁程序,在案件的分类、程序的启动、时效范围、运作方式等方面都已经相对比较成熟,这无疑为我国速裁程序的构建提供了借鉴参考。为期两年的试点工作为速裁程序的建立积累了宝贵的实践经验,但同时也暴露出了受案范围过于狭窄、程序效率低下、当事人诉讼权利保护不充分等一系列问题。因此,要构建我国的刑事速裁程序就要在借鉴国外先进经验的基础上,结合我国自身的特点修正试点中出现的问题,注重速审权的保障性立法、明确速裁程序的受案范围、设置合理的程序运作机制,同时加强律师介入,在保证司法公正的前提下,加快刑事诉讼进程。
[Abstract]:"the quicker and timely the punishment for a crime, the more just and beneficial it will be." Just and rapid resolution of cases, but also has been our criminal justice unremitting pursuit. However, the quick adjudication procedure of minor criminal cases can help to solve the "judicial malady" of high detention rate and extended detention under the condition of high incidence of crime in our country, while protecting the prosecution's right to adjudicate quickly and improving the efficiency of litigation. In foreign countries, especially in the United States, Japan, Germany and other countries, they have established criminal adjudication procedures with their own characteristics one after another. They have been relatively mature in the classification of cases, the initiation of procedures, the scope of limitation, the mode of operation, and so on. This undoubtedly provides the reference for the construction of the quick adjudication procedure in our country. The pilot work for two years has accumulated valuable practical experience for the establishment of the quick adjudication procedure, but at the same time, it also exposed a series of problems such as too narrow scope of accepting cases, inefficiency of procedure, inadequate protection of litigants' rights and so on. Therefore, in order to construct the criminal quick adjudication procedure in our country, we should draw lessons from the advanced experience of foreign countries, combine the characteristics of our country to correct the problems that appear in the pilot project, pay attention to the safeguard legislation of the speedy adjudication power, and make clear the scope of accepting the cases of the speedy adjudication procedure. Setting up reasonable procedure operation mechanism, strengthening lawyer's intervention, speeding up the process of criminal procedure under the premise of ensuring judicial justice.
【学位授予单位】:青岛大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 高通;;刑事速裁程序证明标准研究[J];法学论坛;2017年02期
2 洪浩;寿媛君;;我国刑事速裁程序迈向理性的崭新课题[J];法学论坛;2017年02期
3 刘广三;李艳霞;;我国刑事速裁程序试点的反思与重构[J];法学;2016年02期
4 汪建成;;以效率为价值导向的刑事速裁程序论纲[J];政法论坛;2016年01期
5 叶肖华;;简上加简:我国刑事速裁程序研究[J];浙江工商大学学报;2016年01期
6 杨恪;;论刑事简易程序案件中的辩护问题[J];理论界;2015年12期
7 廖大刚;白云飞;;刑事案件速裁程序试点运行现状实证分析——以T市八家试点法院为研究样本[J];法律适用;2015年12期
8 潘金贵;李冉毅;;规则与实效:刑事速裁程序运行的初步检视[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2015年06期
9 丁文生;;刑事速裁程序改革探析——基于刑期一年以下轻微刑事案的讨论[J];广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2015年05期
10 董照南;张爱晓;;刑事速裁试点中存在的问题及解决对策[J];中国审判;2015年17期
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 周斌;;保障当事人权益贯穿刑事速裁全程[N];法制日报;2015年
2 黄洁;;刑事速裁案件平均6天审结[N];法制日报;2015年
3 王春;;符合条件案件“走快车道”速审快判[N];法制日报;2015年
,本文编号:1896876
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1896876.html