关键词解读:非法实物证据排除规则的解释与适用

发布时间：2018-05-21 18:26

本文选题：非法证据排除 + 物证　；参考：《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年03期

【摘要】：中国新刑诉法第54条确立的非法物证、书证排除规则在法解释学上,尚有诸多问题有待探讨。对于补正或合理解释这一要件,应当作如下解释,即只有属于瑕疵证据的物证、书证才可以补正或合理解释,属于非法证据的则应直接排除。非法取得的笔录类证据、视听资料、电子数据等,属于广义的实物证据,也应适用非法证据排除规则。"不符合法定程序"是指不符合法律及相关司法解释的取证程序规定;取证主体不应作为非法证据的构成要件。"可能严重影响司法公正"应从实体上判断非法取证是否影响证据的客观真实性,同时从程序上判断是否损害司法的权威及公信力。对于非法物证、书证排除规则,必须在一定程度上引入毒树之果原则,并附带设置必要的例外。
[Abstract]:Illegal material evidence established in Article 54 of the new Criminal procedure Law of China, the rule of exclusion of documentary evidence has many problems to be discussed in legal hermeneutics. It should be explained as follows: only the material evidence belongs to defective evidence, the documentary evidence can be corrected or explained reasonably, and the illegal evidence should be ruled out directly. Illegally obtained documentary evidence, audiovisual materials, electronic data, etc., which belong to a broad range of physical evidence, shall also be subject to the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence. " Failure to comply with legal procedures "means failure to comply with the provisions of the law and the relevant judicial interpretation of the evidentiary procedure; the subject of evidence shall not be regarded as a constituent element of unlawful evidence." It may seriously affect judicial justice. "We should judge whether illegal evidence collection affects the objective authenticity of evidence from the entity, and judge whether it damages the authority and credibility of the judicature from the procedural point of view at the same time." For illegal material evidence, the rule of book evidence exclusion must introduce the fruit of poison tree to a certain extent, with necessary exceptions.
【作者单位】：四川大学法学院;
【基金】：2011年度国家社科基金重点项目“司法改革与我国刑事证据制度完善”(11AFX015) 教育部“新世纪优秀人才支持计划”资助项目:“隐形刑事诉讼法”(NCET-10-0602)
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】