我国紧急仲裁员制度的理性评判与制度完善

发布时间：2018-05-22 07:45

本文选题：紧急仲裁员制度 + 紧急仲裁员价值　；参考：《太原科技大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：仲裁是现代社会解决纠纷的手段之一,随着社会发展仲裁制度创设出新的紧急仲裁员制度。国际上紧急仲裁员制度的前身是国际商会在二十世纪九十年代创设的公断人制度,其采取选择并入模式,此种模式下导致公断人制度鲜为运用。2009年国际争议解决中心开始正式规定紧急仲裁员制度,并采取约定排除模式,并被国际其他仲裁机构引入。我国北京仲裁委员会、中国经济贸易仲裁委员会、上海仲裁中心也在2015年起引入紧急仲裁员制度,但刚引入的紧急仲裁员制度还未完全成熟。香港H公司诉K公司运用紧急仲裁员促成争议高效解决,我国A公司诉B学院案未用紧急仲裁员导致争议解决相对拖延,两个案例正反对比折射出紧急仲裁员制度的效率性、程序前置性和兼容性特点,在尊重当事人意思自治、控制权利滥用、均等保护的价值。我国紧急仲裁员制度与其他地区紧急仲裁员制度进行比较,我国紧急仲裁员制度存在发布临时保全受限、权利内容狭窄、裁决的强制执行力不足的问题,对应提出构建二元保全制度、扩大权利内容、认可紧急仲裁员地位、赋予裁决强制执行效力的建议,为我国进一步完善紧急仲裁员制度提供借鉴和指导。
[Abstract]:Arbitration is one of the methods to solve disputes in modern society. With the development of society, a new system of emergency arbitrators is created. The predecessor of the international emergency arbitrators system was the umpire system created by the International Chamber of Commerce in the 1990s. In 2009, the International dispute Resolution Center began to formalize the emergency arbitrators system, and adopted an agreed exclusion model, which was introduced by other international arbitration institutions. China's Beijing Arbitration Commission, China Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission and Shanghai Arbitration Center also introduced the emergency arbitrators system in 2015, but the emergency arbitrators system just introduced is not yet fully mature. Hong Kong H Company v. K Company uses emergency arbitrators to facilitate the efficient settlement of disputes, and the absence of emergency arbitrators in the case of Company A v. College B in China leads to a relative delay in the settlement of disputes. The positive and negative contrast between the two cases reflects the efficiency of the emergency arbitrators system. Program preemption and compatibility features in respect of party autonomy, control of abuse of rights, equal protection of the value. The emergency arbitrators system in our country is compared with the emergency arbitrators system in other regions. The system of emergency arbitrators in our country is limited in issuing temporary protection, narrow in content of rights and insufficient in enforcement of awards. The corresponding suggestions are to construct dual preservation system, to expand the content of rights, to recognize the status of emergency arbitrators, and to give enforcement effect to the award, which provides reference and guidance for our country to further improve the system of emergency arbitrators.
【学位授予单位】：太原科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.7

【相似文献】