论民事执行听证制度

发布时间：2018-05-27 05:07

本文选题：民事执行 + 执行听证　；参考：《吉林大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：民事执行听证制度，是指民事执行活动中，通过举行听证方式，赋予当事人及利害关系人充分表达意见的权利，经过举证、质证、辩论，查明事实，作出裁决，从而保障执行工作顺利进行，同时最大限度保障当事人权益不受侵犯。执行听证在各地法院实施以来，缓和了执行阶段的矛盾，提高了执行公信力。但是，，执行听证由于没有统一规范，各地做法差异较大，地方色彩较浓，个别案件出现了听证适用的混乱情况，不利于执行工作开展，有必要对执行听证进行充分的制度完善。本文以此为出发点，对民事执行听证制度的构建分为三个部分进行论述。本文第一部分对民事执行听证的基本问题进行了梳理。执行听证的理论源泉是“自然主义”和“程序主义”理念，具有公开性、法定性、普适性和程序性特征，同时具有当事人主义、程序性审查和救济性色彩。执行听证还具有维护执行公正、提高执行效率、预防执行腐败等作用。本文第二部分对我国执行听证的制度、实践进行审视。各级法院对本辖区制定了执行听证规则，取得了较好的法律效果和社会效果。但不可否认，执行听证存在立法缺失、程序运行不规范等问题，造成这些问题的原因既有制度层面的，也有观念层面的。本文第三部分对我国执行听证程序制度进行了完善。完善执行听证制度，首先要明确其应当遵循的基本原则，在此基础之上对案件适用范围、具体程序运行、证据制度和相关配套制度进行细化和明确。
[Abstract]:The system of hearing for civil execution refers to the right of the parties and interested parties to fully express their opinions through the holding of hearings in civil enforcement activities, after proof, cross-examination, debate, ascertaining the facts and making a ruling, To ensure the smooth implementation of the work, while the maximum protection of the rights and interests of the parties are not infringed. Since the implementation of the execution hearing in various courts, the contradictions in the execution stage have been alleviated and the credibility of the execution has been enhanced. However, due to the lack of uniform norms, the practice of the implementation of the hearing is quite different, the local color is strong, individual cases appear the chaos of the hearing, which is not conducive to the implementation of the work, it is necessary to carry out a full system to improve the implementation of the hearing. This article takes this as the starting point, the construction of the civil execution hearing system is divided into three parts. The first part of this paper combs the basic problems of civil execution hearing. The theoretical source of the executive hearing is "naturalism" and "procedural doctrine", which have the characteristics of openness, legality, universality and procedure, and at the same time have the color of litigant doctrine, procedural review and relief. The executive hearing also has the function of maintaining the execution justice, improving the execution efficiency, preventing the execution corruption and so on. The second part of this paper examines the system and practice of executive hearing in China. Courts at all levels have formulated rules for the execution of hearings in their respective jurisdictions, which have achieved better legal and social effects. However, it is undeniable that there are some problems in the executive hearing, such as the lack of legislation and the irregular operation of the procedure. The causes of these problems are both institutional and conceptual. The third part of this article has carried on the consummation to our country execution hearing procedure system. In order to perfect the system of execution hearing, it is necessary to clarify the basic principles which should be followed, on the basis of which the scope of application of the case, the operation of specific procedures, the system of evidence and related supporting systems should be refined and clarified.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】