委托代理理论视角下我国巡回法庭制度研究

发布时间：2018-05-27 08:12

  本文选题：委托代理理论 + 司法地方化　； 参考：《西南政法大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：为优化司法职权配置,我国提出设立最高人民法院巡回法庭。然而,巡回法庭制度的构建应遵循怎样的理论预设?其职能如何定位?其与最高人民法院之间的关系如何?如何防止巡回法庭偏离该制度设计的初衷?如何才能确保巡回法庭真正按照最高人民法院的意志行事?这一系列的问题的回答,关乎巡回法庭制度的科学构建与巡回法庭的良性运转。本文在将最高人民法院与巡回法庭之间的关系定位为经济学意义上的委托代理的关系的前提下,详细检讨了我国现行巡回法庭制度的功能偏差与制度错位,并以英国巡回法庭制度的经验借鉴与教训汲取为基础,提出了完善我国巡回法庭制度的意见和建议。全文除引言和结语外,分为四个部分:第一部分,最高法院与巡回法庭相互关系的应然定位。委托人和代理人之间存在非一致目的和非对称信息,代理人可能存在逆向选择和道德风险等偏离委托人目的的行为,委托人的任务是设计最优契约以激励、约束代理人,使代理人从自身目的出发采取行动实现委托人目的最大化。理论层面而言,最高法院和巡回法庭应是委托代理关系,委托代理问题不可不防控。第二部分,我国巡回法庭制度的功能偏差与制度错位。我国巡回法庭制度的功能偏差在于,现行巡回法庭制度的实然功能设定偏离巡回法庭制度在功能欲求上的应然定位。我国巡回法庭制度的制度错位集中体现为现行制度之设计存在激励不足和监督乏力的弊端。第三部分,英国巡回法庭制度委托代理问题治理简析。英国巡回法庭制度为我国巡回法庭制度提供的经验借鉴主要是信任机制治理方式、约束机制、竞争作为激励方式得以运用。教训带来的启发则是委托人不能忽视委托代理关系的外在影响因素,要对代理人目的冲突进行防控。第四部分,我国巡回法庭制度的完善进路。本部分以委托代理理论为指导,以委托代理问题防控为重点。在英国巡回法庭制度运作经验借鉴与教训吸纳的基础上,通过物质激励、职业保障和声誉激励等激励机制的构建,同体监督的强化、公民监督的完善、媒体监督的规范等约束机制的完善,提出了我国巡回法庭制度完善的意见和建议。
[Abstract]:In order to optimize the allocation of judicial power, our country has set up the circuit court of the Supreme People's court. However, how should the construction of the circuit court follow the theoretical presupposition? How does its function be located? How is the relationship with the Supreme People's court? How to prevent the circuit court from being deviated from the design of the system and how to ensure that the circuit court is true In accordance with the will of the Supreme People's court, the answer to this series of questions is about the scientific construction of the circuit court system and the benign operation of the circuit court. This article reviews the current tour of our country on the premise of positioning the relationship between the Supreme People's court and the circuit court as the principal agent relationship in the economic sense. On the basis of the experience and lessons learned from the British circuit court system, the paper puts forward some suggestions and suggestions to improve the system of the circuit court in China. The full text is divided into four parts, in addition to the introduction and conclusion: the first part, the relationship between the Supreme Court and the circuit court should be located. There is an uncongruent and asymmetric information between the agent and the agent. The agent may have the behavior of deviating from the principal's purpose, such as adverse selection and moral hazard. The task of the principal is to design the optimal contract to encourage and restrain the agent, so that the agent can maximize the purpose of realizing the principal from its own purpose. The Supreme Court and the circuit court should be the principal-agent relationship, the principal-agent problem can not be prevented and controlled. The second part, the functional deviation and the system dislocation of the circuit court system in China. The functional deviation of our circuit court system lies in the fact that the actual function of the current circuit court system deviates from the circuit court system in the functional desire. Positioning. The dislocation of the system of the circuit court of our country is concentrated on the shortcomings of the lack of incentive and lack of supervision in the design of the current system. In the third part, a brief analysis on the governance of the principal-agent problem of the British circuit court system. The experience of the British circuit court system for our circuit court system is mainly the way of governance of the trust mechanism, Restriction mechanism, competition is used as an incentive mode. The inspiration of the lesson is that the principal can not ignore the external influence factors of the principal agent relationship and prevent and control the agent's purpose conflict. The fourth part, the perfect approach of the circuit court system of our country. This part is guided by the principal-agent theory and the principal-agent problem prevention and control. On the basis of the experience and lessons learned from the British circuit court system, through the construction of incentive mechanisms such as material incentives, occupational security and reputation incentives, the strengthening of the supervision of the androgyny, the perfection of the supervision of the citizens, the standardization of media supervision, the perfect opinions and construction of the circuit court system in China have been put forward. Argumentative.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库 前10条

1 刘贵祥;;巡回法庭改革的理念与实践[J];法律适用;2015年07期

2 苏镜祥;;什么是最高人民法院巡回法庭?[J];理论视野;2015年04期

3 刘贵祥;胡云腾;;巡回法庭:司法改革的“排头兵”——专访最高人民法院第一、第二巡回法庭庭长[J];中国法律评论;2015年01期

4 顾永忠;;最高人民法院设立巡回法庭之我见[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2015年02期

5 纵博;;最高人民法院巡回法庭的设立背景、功能及设计构想[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2015年02期

6 方斯远;;最高人民法院巡回法庭的制度建构[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2015年02期

7 王吟;;对最高人民法院设立巡回法庭问题的思考[J];南阳理工学院学报;2015年01期

8 傅郁林;;最高人民法院巡回法庭的职能定位与权威形成[J];中国法律评论;2014年04期

9 王凤山;;我国巡回审判制度及最高法院设立巡回法庭相关问题之建议[J];中国律师;2014年12期

10 习近平;;关于《中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定》的说明[J];共产党员(河北);2014年21期

中国重要报纸全文数据库 前1条

1 贺小荣;何帆;马渊杰;;《最高人民法院关于巡回法庭审理案件若干问题的规定》的理解与适用[N];人民法院报;2015年

，

本文编号：1941183