论媒体舆论对司法审判的影响及应对

发布时间：2018-06-01 10:11

本文选题：媒体舆论 + 法院独立行使审判权　；参考：《甘肃政法学院》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：处理好媒体舆论与法院独立审判的关系是我国法治建设的根本,是实现司法公正的关键环节。公民享有言论自由其表达自由必须借助媒体这一平台,这时的媒体则掌握着舆论的话语权,引导着舆论的走向。而且媒体享有对案件报道、公开的自由,其对司法审判的报道是媒体行使舆论监督的表现,媒体舆论在监督司法审判活动中发挥着积极的作用,然而媒体舆论监督给法院审判同时产生诸多消极影响。媒体对案件事实未经求证就肆意宣扬,发表那些虚假、片面、倾向性的言论,影响正确的舆论方向,引发舆论的追捧,导致大规模倾向性舆论的产生,对法院施加压力,干扰法院独立审判,这不仅使当事人的利益受到损害,更不利于司法权威的树立与司法公正的实现。因此,在我国今后的司法审判中防止媒体舆论干扰法院独立审判,减轻法院审判的压力,我国可以借鉴域外成熟的实践经验,找到一条符合我国国情的媒体舆论与法院独立审判和谐发展的路径,处理好两者之间的关系将是本文重点讨论的问题,希望通过本文能够为这一问题的解决提供一些粗陋的意见。本文共分为四部分,第一部分首先介绍媒体舆论与司法审判基本理论,阐述媒体舆论的内涵及特有的法律功能,法院独立行使审判权及公开审判制度的相关内容。进而分析两者之间的关系,媒体舆论对司法审判的监督过程,法院对媒体舆论的监督作出何种回应,在法律层面是如何规定媒体舆论监督司法审判的行为。其次分析媒体舆论对我国司法审判产生哪些影响,从积极和消极两个方面着手。最后论述媒体舆论对法院审判产生消极影响的原因。第二部分从媒体舆论影响司法审判的立法现状、司法现状进行分析,进而发现其中存在的问题,主要从立法、法院、媒体三个方面去考量。第三部分主要介绍国际准则和域外法律中如何处理媒体舆论与法院独立审判的关系,通过分析大陆法系国家与英美法系国家的不同点,提出对我国处理两者关系的借鉴经验。第四部分分别从法院和媒体入手,找到一条适合我国媒体舆论与法院独立审判和谐发展的解决路径。
[Abstract]:To deal with the relationship between media public opinion and the independent trial of the court is the foundation of the construction of the rule of law in our country and the key link to realize the judicial justice. Citizens enjoy freedom of speech and their freedom of expression must rely on the platform of media, at which time the media hold the voice of public opinion and guide the trend of public opinion. Moreover, the media enjoy the freedom to report cases and to be open to the public. Their coverage of judicial trials is a manifestation of the media exercising supervision by public opinion, and media public opinion plays an active role in the supervision of judicial activities. However, the supervision of media and public opinion has a lot of negative effects on the court trial at the same time. The media wantonly propagandized the facts of the case without verification, making those false, one-sided and tendentiousness statements, affecting the correct direction of public opinion, triggering the pursuit of public opinion, leading to the generation of large-scale biased public opinion, and exerting pressure on the court. Interfering with the independent trial of the court not only damages the interests of the parties, but also is not conducive to the establishment of judicial authority and the realization of judicial justice. Therefore, in the future judicial trial in China, to prevent media opinion from interfering with the independent trial of the court and to alleviate the pressure of the court trial, our country can learn from the overseas mature practical experience. To find a way for the harmonious development of media opinion and independent trial in accordance with the national conditions of our country, and to deal with the relationship between the two will be the key issue discussed in this paper. It is hoped that this paper can provide some rough suggestions for the solution of this problem. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part introduces the media public opinion and the basic theory of judicial trial, expounds the connotation and special legal function of media public opinion, the independent exercise of court jurisdiction and the relevant contents of open trial system. Then it analyzes the relationship between the two, the supervision process of the media public opinion to the judicial trial, the response of the court to the supervision of the media public opinion, and how to regulate the behavior of the media public opinion to supervise the judicial trial in the legal level. Secondly, it analyzes the influence of media public opinion on judicial trial in China, from both positive and negative aspects. Finally, the paper discusses the reasons of the negative influence of media opinion on the court trial. In the second part, the author analyzes the current situation of the legislation of judicial trial influenced by media public opinion, and then finds out the existing problems, mainly from three aspects: legislation, court and media. The third part mainly introduces how to deal with the relationship between the media opinion and the independent trial of the court in the international standards and the extraterritorial laws. By analyzing the differences between the countries of the civil law system and the countries of the common law system, the author puts forward the experience of our country in dealing with the relationship between the two. The fourth part starts with the court and the media, and finds a solution to the harmonious development of the media opinion and the court independent trial.
【学位授予单位】：甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G206;D926.2

【相似文献】