我国刑事证明标准印证化之批判

发布时间：2018-06-01 11:13

本文选题：证明标准 + 印证化　；参考：《法学》2017年08期

【摘要】：现代刑事证明标准是衡量裁判者内心主观信念程度的标尺,是主观范畴。我国刑事证明标准从确立之初就选择了客观化的立场,以实事求是对抗自由心证,以客观验证代替裁判者内心的主观信念程度,形成了刑事证明标准的印证化。由"供证一致"到印证规则的法定化,我国的印证规则体系日益规范、细化。但刑事证明标准的印证化掩盖了事实认定过程的主观性,虚化了证明标准的制度功能,异化了印证证据分析方法的运用,加剧了庭审证明的形式化,最终影响了我国刑事诉讼制度的合理构建。以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革为我国刑事证明标准的主观转向提供了事实基础和程序保障,未来应把印证规则与刑事证明标准相剥离,确立并强化排除合理怀疑证明标准的地位及其应用,并明确印证作为证据分析方法的功能及走向。
[Abstract]:The standard of modern criminal proof is a measure of the subjective belief of the referee and a subjective category. The standard of criminal proof in our country has chosen the position of objectification from the beginning of its establishment. The degree of subjective belief in the heart of the referee is replaced by objective verification, which forms the corroboration of the standard of criminal proof. From "consistent testimony" to legalization of corroboration rules, the system of corroboration rules in our country is becoming more and more standardized and refined. However, the verification of the criminal proof standard conceals the subjectivity of the process of the fact determination, the system function of the proof standard, the dissimilation of the application of the analysis method of the corroboration evidence, and intensifies the formalization of the trial proof. Finally, it affects the reasonable construction of criminal procedure system in our country. The reform of the litigation system centered on trial provides a factual basis and procedural guarantee for the subjective turn of the standard of criminal proof in our country. In the future, the verification rules should be separated from the standard of criminal proof. To establish and strengthen the status and application of the standard of proof without reasonable doubt, and to clearly confirm the function and trend of evidence analysis.
【作者单位】：国家"2011计划"司法文明协同创新中心;吉林大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目《非法证据排除规则的实践困境及其立法完善研究》(项目批准号:15BFX093)的阶段性成果吉林大学廉政研究与教育中心项目《纪检程序中自书材料的证据价值研究》(项目批准号:2015LZY003)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】