执行和解协议的可诉性研究

发布时间：2018-06-02 04:24

本文选题：执行和解协议 + 可诉性　；参考：《黑龙江大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：执行和解协议是双方当事人在法院强制执行生效法律文书过程中自愿达成的民事契约。执行和解协议乃私权处分的载体,当事人通常能够自动履行,故成为破解执行难、化解社会矛盾的一剂良方。现行《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》对执行和解制度的规定较为粗疏,理论界对执行和解协议的性质、效力以及可诉性等问题也存在较大分歧。执行实务中,时常出现立案不受、执行不能的尴尬局面。文章结合执行实务中的典型案例,对执行和解协议的法律属性、法律效力、可诉性的理论基础以及可诉的具体案件类型等问题进行深入剖析,针对执行和解协议的诉讼路径提出了司法确认程序和普通诉讼程序两种思路,并结合不同救济路径的特点阐述了具体的程序构想。
[Abstract]:The enforcement of settlement agreement is a civil contract between the parties in the process of enforcing the effective legal documents. The execution of reconciliation agreement is the carrier of disposition of private rights, and the parties are usually able to perform it automatically, so it becomes a good prescription to solve the problems of execution and resolve social contradictions. The current Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China has a rather rudimentary stipulation on the enforcement of the settlement system, and there are also great differences in the nature, validity and justiciability of the enforcement of the settlement agreement among the theorists. In the practice of execution, there is often an embarrassing situation that the case is not accepted and the execution is not possible. Combining with the typical cases in the practice of enforcement, this paper makes a deep analysis of the legal attributes, legal effects, the theoretical basis of actionable nature, and the types of specific cases that can be sued in the enforcement of settlement agreements. This paper puts forward two kinds of thinking of judicial confirmation procedure and ordinary litigation procedure in view of the litigation path of implementing settlement agreement, and expounds the concrete procedure conception combined with the characteristics of different relief paths.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】