我国不同区际司法协助模式下的区际送达

发布时间：2018-06-02 05:39

本文选题：区际司法协助 + 区际送达　；参考：《河北法学》2017年08期

【摘要】：我国的区际司法协助,内地与港澳采"安排模式"、大陆与台湾地区采"单向分别立法结合双向协议"模式。尽管模式不同,表面上的属性不同,内地与港澳、大陆与台湾的司法文书送达,主要依托公权力进行。不同模式下的送达规定互有异同、各有不足。"安排"和"双向协议"的共同特点是双边协商、分别执行,最高人民法院通过单方改进做法,制定司法解释以解决司法文书送达的困难,但也引发如何理顺协商与执行问题的思考。我国区际送达应利用多种途径,且进一步提高委托送达效率。
[Abstract]:China's inter-regional judicial assistance, the mainland, Hong Kong and Macao adopt the "arrangement model", the mainland and Taiwan adopt the "unidirectional legislation combined with two-way agreement" model. Although the mode is different, the appearance attribute is different, the mainland and Hong Kong and Macao, the mainland and Taiwan's judicial document service, mainly rely on the public power to carry on. The service regulations in different modes have similarities and differences, and each has its own shortcomings. " The common features of the arrangement "and the Bidirectional Agreement" are bilateral consultations, which are implemented separately, and the Supreme people's Court, through unilateral improvement, formulates judicial interpretations to resolve the difficulties in the service of judicial documents, But it also leads to thinking about how to straighten out the problems of consultation and implementation. Inter-regional service in China should use many ways and further improve the efficiency of entrustment service.
【作者单位】：厦门大学法学院;
【分类号】：D926

【相似文献】