提审制的机理、效应与未来

发布时间：2018-06-03 18:13

本文选题：提审制 + 层级结构　；参考：《法学论坛》2014年01期

【摘要】：提审是司法系统中上级法院对下级法院管辖或者审结的案件主动提起进行审判的机制,极典型地演绎着法院审判业务上一种中国式的上下级关系。中国语境下支撑提审制的理论及基础主要是司法系统的层级结构、上级法院的权威与正确性、整体把关的司法职责、实体真实观与示范效应、谨慎与效率的司法观。由于内在机理的缺陷及实践运行中消极因素的干扰,提审制带来负面效应,导致司法的非正常运作,影响当事人程序权益及司法独立与权威。现行提审制运行呈现一些倾向,合理性与弊病共存,实践效果欠佳,然而整体制度环境与价值基础没有发生大幅变迁的现阶段,其被废除可能性不大,但亟待被完善。而且,长远来看,该制度面临直接触及合法性基础的挑战,病理及危害远远超过存在的益处,其未来走向应当是被废除,并应借此重构我国尊重司法规律的制度化的法院审判业务关系。
[Abstract]:Arraignment is a mechanism in the judicial system in which a higher court initiates a trial of a case under the jurisdiction or closure of a lower court, which typically deduces a Chinese-style relationship between the superior and the subordinate in the court's trial business. In Chinese context, the theories and foundations of the system of arraignment are mainly the hierarchical structure of the judicial system, the authority and correctness of the higher court, the judicial duty of the whole gatekeeper, the view of entity truth and the demonstration effect, the judicial view of prudence and efficiency. Due to the defects of internal mechanism and the interference of negative factors in practice, the arraignment system brings negative effects, which leads to the abnormal operation of the judiciary and affects the procedural rights and interests of the parties and the independence and authority of the judicial system. There are some tendencies in the operation of the current system of arraignment, rationality and malady coexist, and the practice effect is not good. However, the overall institutional environment and the value foundation have not changed substantially at the present stage, it is unlikely to be abolished, but it needs to be improved urgently. Moreover, in the long run, the system faces challenges that directly touch the foundations of legitimacy, pathology and harm far outweigh the benefits of existence and should be abolished in the future. And we should take this to reconstruct the systematized court trial business relationship which respects the law of judicature in our country.
【作者单位】：中山大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目《制度变迁的本土实践及其方法论》(BYJC820082) 广东省哲学社会科学规划项目《变革社会的程序理想》(09G-12)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】