民事执行检察监督制度的实证分析与立法完善

发布时间：2018-06-04 01:14

本文选题：执行检察监督 + 监督范围　；参考：《辽宁大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：执行程序虽然是司法最后的一个环节,但执行的顺利进行却是保障司法公正的基本。为了解决执行程序出现的问题,2012年民事诉讼法在修订时特地加入了民事执行检察监督制度,立法者本意通过检察机关的介入促进法院执行的高效运行,但由于制度较为新颖,立法规定不足,导致该项制度并未给出具体的操作方案。各级检察机关手握权力却无力行使。为了使该项制度在实际工作中得到运用,笔者为其制定了具体程序。本文开篇通过分析最高院的两个典型案例,指出执行检察监督制度的不足。然后通过分析法律条文得出我国执行检察监督制度存在的具体问题,包括执行检察监督的具体范围不明确；监督方式不统一；监督方式不统一；监督运行程序不完善；监督缺乏必要的保障；监督缺乏制约等问题。在指出存在问题的同时与案例相结合,分析问题存在的原因以及问题对制度运行的危害。最后针对上文存在的问题,结合制度问题存在的原因提出了相关的完善措施。明确了检察监督的具体范围,包括执行裁决不当、执行过程中不作为、执行过程中侵害国家公共利益的行为等执行机关违法违规的行为。同时需要强调的是,有关国家机关个人不配合执行的行为也应属于执行检察监督的范围。对检察机关的监督方式也作出了具体规定,包括检察建议、纠正违法通知书等。对检察监督制度运行程序规定的不明确的地方加以明确,检察监督的启动方式,具体管辖等作出了明确规定。对民事执行检察监督的保障也设置了相关的配套措施,例如调查权、检察建议回馈等保障措施。检察监督权在不缺位的同时也应做到不越位,以免对执行权造成侵害。希望相关法律规定可以尽快出台,弥补法律规定的不足,使民事执行检察监督制度得以贯彻,检法两家携手共同解决执行程序存在的问题。
[Abstract]:The execution procedure is the last link of the judicature, but the smooth execution is the basic to guarantee the judicial justice. In order to solve the problems arising from the execution procedure, the Civil procedure Law was specially added to the Civil Enforcement Procuratorial Supervision system when it was revised in 2012. The legislators intended to promote the efficient operation of the court execution through the involvement of the procuratorial organs, but the system was relatively novel. Legislative provisions are inadequate, resulting in the system has not given a specific operation plan. Procuratorial organs at all levels hold power but are unable to exercise it. In order to make this system applied in practice, the author has made concrete procedure for it. By analyzing two typical cases of the Supreme Court, this paper points out the shortcomings of the procuratorial supervision system. Then through the analysis of the legal provisions of the implementation of procuratorial supervision system in China the existence of specific problems, including the implementation of procuratorial supervision of the specific scope is not clear, the way of supervision is not uniform, supervision operation procedures are not perfect; The supervision lacks the necessary guarantee; the supervision lacks the restriction and so on. At the same time, the author points out the existing problems and combines them with cases, and analyzes the causes of the problems and the harm of the problems to the operation of the system. Finally, according to the above existing problems, combined with the causes of the system problems, put forward the relevant improvement measures. It clarifies the specific scope of procuratorial supervision, including improper execution of the ruling, failure to act in the process of execution, acts against the public interest of the state in the process of execution, and other illegal and illegal acts of the executive organs. At the same time, it should be emphasized that the individual behavior of the relevant state organs should also belong to the scope of execution of procuratorial supervision. The supervision of the procuratorial organ has also made specific provisions, including procuratorial suggestions, correction of illegal notices and so on. This paper clarifies the unclear place of the operating procedure of the procuratorial supervision system, the starting mode and the specific jurisdiction of the procuratorial supervision system. Some relative measures have been set up for the protection of civil execution supervision, such as investigation power, procuratorial suggestion feedback and so on. Procuratorial supervision power should not be absent but also not offside, so as to avoid encroachment on executive power. I hope the relevant laws and regulations can be issued as soon as possible to make up for the deficiencies of the legal provisions, so that the procuratorial supervision system of civil execution can be carried out, and the two procuratorates will work together to solve the problems existing in the enforcement procedures.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D926.3

【参考文献】