刑事司法解释中的证明简化对控辩平等原则的冲击--兼论司法解释制度的完善及其与案例指导制度的功能划分与衔接

发布时间：2018-06-04 03:03

本文选题：刑事司法解释 + 证明简化　；参考：兼论司法解释制度的完善及其与案例指导制度的功能划分与衔接

【摘要】：刑事司法解释在解释立法、统一法律适用的同时创设了一批旨在指导个案事实认定的抽象规则。刑事司法解释中的事实认定规则客观上导致了"证明简化"的后果,对控辩平等原则造成冲击,因而其正当性存疑。刑事司法解释中的证明简化对控辩平等原则的冲击是当前司法解释运行实践偏离该制度功能定位的典型反映。为协调解释立法与指导个案之间的关系,应当进一步完善司法解释制度,并使其与案例指导制度形成功能上的划分与衔接。
[Abstract]:While interpreting the legislation and unifying the application of the law, the criminal judicial interpretation creates a number of abstract rules aimed at guiding the determination of facts in individual cases. The rule of factual cognizance in criminal judicial interpretation objectively leads to the consequence of "proof simplification", which impacts the principle of equality of prosecution and defense, and therefore its legitimacy is doubtful. The impact of proof simplification in criminal judicial interpretation on the principle of equality of prosecution and defense is a typical reflection of the deviation from the functional orientation of the system in the current practice of judicial interpretation. In order to coordinate the relationship between the interpretation of legislation and the guiding cases, the judicial interpretation system should be further improved, and the division and connection between the function of the judicial interpretation system and the case guidance system should be made.
【作者单位】：山东大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】