“死磕型”程序性辩护问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-07 13:28

  本文选题：法庭秩序 + 程序性辩护　； 参考：《江西社会科学》2017年03期

【摘要】：辩审冲突在我国的典型表现是"死磕",曾经引起极大争议,赞誉者期许其"磕出法治",质疑者称其破坏法治,其虽已呈衰败之势,但得失仍值得反思。"死磕型"程序性辩护具有多样化、冲突化、极端化和诉诸舆论化等特点,一些"死磕"方式违反了现行法律,引入舆论会对司法权威造成损害。程序性辩护的完善,应当从保障独立公正行使审判权入手,强调辩审之间的相互尊重,合理打击非法"死磕"行为,避免过于诉诸舆论、行为艺术化倾向。
[Abstract]:The typical manifestation of the conflict of debate and trial in our country is "stale war", which has caused great controversy. The admirers expect it to "knock out the rule of law", and the skeptics say that it has destroyed the rule of law. Although it has shown a trend of decline, its gains and losses are still worthy of reflection. " The procedural defense of "dead knock" has the characteristics of diversification, conflict, extremism and appeal to public opinion. Some "dead knock" methods violate the existing law, and the introduction of public opinion will damage the judicial authority. The perfection of procedural defense should start with the guarantee of independent and fair exercise of judicial power, emphasize mutual respect between arguments and trials, reasonably crack down on illegal "dead and high" behavior, avoid too much appeal to public opinion and artistic tendency of behavior.
【作者单位】： 江西财经大学法治政府研究中心;江西财经大学法学院;
【基金】：江西省研究生创新专项资金项目 “化解辩审冲突的对策研究 ——以周建华、周文斌案为例”(YC2015-S220) 江西财经大学法治江西建设协同创新中心招标项目“职务犯罪指定监视居住的功能及风险防范”(ZD201602)
【分类号】：D925.2
，

本文编号：1991331