检察环节非法证据排除要点探析

发布时间：2018-06-12 08:47

本文选题：非法证据排除 + 目的解释　；参考：《人民检察》2017年06期

【摘要】：当前司法实务中非法证据排除难的原因,一定程度上是因为缺乏认定非法证据的统一标准。从实务来看,违反管辖制度取得的证据并不构成非法证据;违反回避制度取得的证据也不能一概认定为非法证据;只要能确证审讯的合法性和口供的真实性,未进行全程同步录音录像的口供也不构成非法证据;合适成年人未到场,未成年犯罪嫌疑人的口供构成非法证据应予排除;伪证属于证明力的范畴而非证据能力的范畴,因而亦不构成非法证据;违法剥夺辩护律师会见权期间收集的口供并不构成非法证据;侦查人员在人别讯问阶段采用暴力手段,制作的案情讯问笔录同样应认定为非法证据;不能以不符合刑事诉讼的取证程序否定行政执法证据的证据资格。
[Abstract]:The reason why it is difficult to exclude illegal evidence in current judicial practice is to some extent the lack of a unified standard for the identification of illegal evidence. In practice, evidence obtained in violation of the jurisdiction system does not constitute illegal evidence; evidence obtained in violation of the challenge system cannot be considered as illegal evidence; as long as the legality of the trial and the authenticity of the confession can be ascertained, Confessions that have not been recorded synchronously throughout the course also do not constitute illegal evidence; if a suitable adult is not present, the confession of a minor criminal suspect shall be excluded from constituting illegal evidence; and false testimony belongs to the category of evidentiary power rather than the scope of evidentiary capacity, Therefore, it does not constitute illegal evidence; the confessions collected during the illegal deprivation of the right to interview the defence lawyer do not constitute illegal evidence; the investigators use violent means in the stage of individual interrogation, and the record of the case interrogation should also be considered as illegal evidence; The evidentiary qualification of administrative law enforcement evidence cannot be denied by the procedure of obtaining evidence that does not conform to the criminal procedure.
【作者单位】：四川大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】