辩护律师拒证权研究

发布时间：2018-06-20 07:54

本文选题：律师 + 拒证权　；参考：《中国青年政治学院》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：以大陆法系和英美法系为典型代表的国家中,都已将律师拒证制度作为了一项重要的证据规则加以了明确的规定,并制定出了相关的方案,律师在整个刑事诉讼中都享有拒证的权利。规定这项制度的主要目的是为了更好地保护特定的关系和利益,这种规则之所以存在的核心的理由是希望社会利用保守秘密来促进和平衡,诸多的更是为了重要的利益关系,以英国为例,他们在整个诉讼模式环节下,为了使得当事人与其当事人的律师进行自由的沟通和交流,并且为了确保一些合法的信息的保护,且对这些信息提供相关的法律意见,英国对此规定了律师拒证权的具体规则。在其他国家中,也有对律师拒证权作出了规定。而在我国对于律师拒绝作证权的相关法律法条与司法解释等制度设计方面有待进一步完善,这样也有助于我国进一步对证据制度的完善。文章对拒证权制度展开研究,并对各国的理论研究进行了系统地论述。文章首先对律师拒证权的整个内容提出问题,通过结合《刑事诉讼法》修改的第46条的司法解释研究律师拒证权的相关问题,并借鉴国外的立法和实践来讨论并分析;其次以两大法系的主要代表国家为基础进行比较研究,对律师拒证权的性质以及制定其规则的特权和义务进行阐述;再次介绍了我国对拒证权制度没有明确的规定,从而会导致的法律后果,分析了引进拒证权的研究的好处,进一步对国内对于这项制度的不健全理论加以思考和论述。在以人为本的全面发展为核心的当今社会,在我国推进法治国家进程中,在证据制度方面的设计要严格做到以法律的实践出发,同时也要考虑到如何体现以人为本的理念,从而真正的保证律师拒证的权利和义务的正确的履行,真正为律师这具有特殊身份的人群能够有效的发挥社会价值的作用,从而提供坚实的保障。
[Abstract]:In the countries that are represented by the continental law system and the common law system, the system of denial of evidence by lawyers has been clearly stipulated as an important rule of evidence, and the relevant schemes have been worked out. Lawyers have the right to refuse to testify throughout the criminal proceedings. The main purpose of stipulating this system is to better protect specific relationships and interests. The core reason why this rule exists is the hope that society will use secrecy to promote and balance, and many more for important interests. In the United Kingdom, for example, in order to allow their clients to communicate and communicate freely with their lawyers, and to ensure the protection of some legitimate information, throughout the proceedings, And provides the relevant legal opinion to this information, the British has stipulated the specific rule of the lawyer's right to refuse to testify. In other countries, there are also provisions on lawyers' right to refuse evidence. But in our country to the lawyer to refuse to testify the right to testify the related law article and the judicial explanation system design aspect to need to further consummate, this also helps our country further to the evidence system consummation. This paper studies the system of the right to refuse proof, and systematically discusses the theoretical research of various countries. At first, the article puts forward the question to the whole content of lawyer's right of refusing to testify, studies the related problems of lawyer's right of refusing proof by combining the judicial interpretation of Article 46 of the revised Criminal procedure Law, and discusses and analyzes the legislation and practice of foreign countries. Secondly, on the basis of the comparative study of the main representative countries of the two legal systems, this paper expounds the nature of lawyers' right to refuse to testify and the privileges and obligations of making their rules. Again, it introduces that there is no clear stipulation on the system of the right of refusal of proof in our country. This paper analyzes the advantages of the research on the introduction of the right to refuse proof, and further discusses the imperfect theory of this system in China. In today's society with the overall development of people-oriented as the core, in the process of promoting the rule of law in our country, the design of the evidence system should be strictly based on the practice of law, and how to embody the idea of "people-oriented" should be considered at the same time. So as to truly guarantee the right and obligation of lawyers to refuse to testify correctly, the lawyers who have a special status can effectively play the role of social value, so as to provide a solid guarantee.
【学位授予单位】：中国青年政治学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】