我国刑事速裁程序启动与转化问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-22 03:54

本文选题：刑事速裁程序 + 启动与转化　；参考：《青岛大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：从我国刑事速裁程序运行过程来看,启动与转化无疑是关键环节。它是建立在合作化司法的理论基础之上,当案件符合条件时启动,不符合条件时及时转化程序以保障当事人权利的重要环节。通过对以德国和美国为代表的大陆法系、英美法系简易速裁程序启动与转化模式的对比分析可以发现,当事人认罪的自愿性与否是程序能否启动的关键一笔,这与我国的速裁程序启动模式不谋而合。当前,我国在刑事速裁程序的启动和转化环节设定了严格的主客观标准,但是在程序的运行中也暴露出一些问题:比如案件的适用范围较窄、当事人对程序的选择权较弱,认罪的自愿性不能得到充分的保障,程序的转化规定的不够具体等。因此,要抓紧完善相关机制,在当事人、法院、检察院三方共同发力,比如构建庭前预审听审程序,严格程序启动决定的做出,既要保障当事人认罪的自愿性、对程序的选择权,又要保障法院对程序适用正当性的严控。唯有这样,才能共同改善启动与转化环节存在的问题,更好地推进速裁程序的运行。
[Abstract]:From the point of view of the operation process of the criminal quick-adjudication procedure in our country, starting and transforming is undoubtedly the key link. It is an important link based on the theory of cooperative justice, when the case meets the conditions, and when it does not meet the conditions, it can transform the procedure in time to protect the rights of the parties. Through the comparative analysis of the mode of initiation and transformation of the simplified and quick adjudication procedure in the common law system, it is found that the voluntary nature of the parties' confession is the key to the initiation of the procedure, through the comparative analysis of the civil law system represented by Germany and the United States. This with our country's quick start-up mode coincides with the procedure. At present, China has set strict subjective and objective criteria for the initiation and transformation of the criminal procedure, but some problems have been exposed in the operation of the procedure: for example, the scope of application of the case is relatively narrow, and the parties' right to choose the procedure is relatively weak. The voluntary nature of confession can not be fully protected, the procedures of the conversion provisions are not specific enough. Therefore, it is necessary to urgently improve the relevant mechanisms and work together in the parties, courts, and procuratorates to make joint efforts, for example, to set up pre-trial hearing procedures before court, to make decisions on the initiation of strict procedures, and to ensure the voluntary nature of the parties' admission of guilt. The right to choose the procedure, but also to ensure that the court of the application of strict control of the legitimacy of the procedure. Only in this way can the problems in startup and transformation be improved, and the operation of the quick-cut procedure can be better promoted.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】